Bro. Ostis Wilson Jr.'s Commentary


Ministers and Offices in the Church


 

Questions Concerning . . .

(Click on a heading to read the respective article.)

 
 

 
Offices in the Church (Selection/ Duties/ Ordination)

Question: Will you please comment some on the different parts of the ministry and other officers in the Church; the methods of their selection, the method of certification or ordination and procedure for this and their duties, etc.

Answer: This is a very big subject and I am certain I will not be able to cover it in the space allotted to me in this column, but perhaps I can produce a few important points that might be helpful to the questioner. Though it is a very large topic, it is a very beautiful one and I am glad for the opportunity to present a few points on it for the consideration of the readers.

First, let us realize that the human body which is used as a model of the Body of Christ, the Church, throughout the 12th chapter of I Corinthians and in many other scriptures of the New Testament is the most complete, synchronized and most completely harmonious in the functioning of all its parts of any organism that there is. The reader may read the entire chapter of I Corinthians 12; Romans 12:5; Ephesians 1:22-23 and Galatians 1:24 as they are all related to this point. God fashioned, built and organized His Church on this model. But to build a Church after this fashion (Matthew 16:18; Hebrews 8:2; Colossians 1:18) is to assemble the members of the Church together to join them together by joints and bands (Colossians 2:19) and furnish it with organs and necessary facilities to function as a unified body. To form the body of Christ, He has brought together, in order, a number of persons, saved men and women who have been saved and cleansed from sin by the blood of Jesus, and put them together in an orderly, functional, structured whole so they can function as a unit.

Then within this body He has provided a special, distinct group of individuals called ministers with various gifts and callings to meet the health needs of the body, and among other things, to function as a kind of built-in, self-healing facility so that the body may maintain a good, healthy condition and function efficiently for its intended purpose a soul-saving and a soul-nurturing institution. There is in the human body a specified quantity of blood and in that blood are numerous minute particles called corpuscles. The particular function of certain of these corpuscles is to fight infection and promote the healing process in any part where the body has been hurt or has sustained a severe wound, bruise or injury. The procedure is this: when such a thing happens in any part of the body, the blood immediately rushes to that part conveying these corpuscles to that area. These corpuscles just come swarming into that particular trouble spot and immediately set up a fight against the wound, bruise or injury. The ministry that God has set in the Church serves the body of Christ in a similar capacity. I saw this very beautifully demonstrated at a time when an infectious situation had developed in a certain area. An SOS call for help was sent out. Ministers heard the call in far distant places and in several states.

Those ministers were consecrated, dedicated men to God and His cause and the body had been severely injured and was in danger. When they received the call they immediately dropped what they were doing and immediately arranged plans to travel. Some came from a distance of 2500 miles and from several different states and converged on the infectious area ready to do battle with the infection and take steps to set up a healing process of the condition. Not only did the ministers respond in this case but the saints throughout this far-flung area rallied to the emergency and on very short notice raised sufficient money to cover the traveling expenses of all those ministers traveling by plane from great distances. But a severe emergency was existing, the body of Christ had received a severe injury and was in danger and the situation immediately set in motion the in-built self-healing agency that God has set up in the body of Christ when He built it. Actually nothing else mattered right then but to get there and get the infection stopped and set up a healing process for the condition.

In Acts 20:28 we read, "Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood." This verse is contained in Paul's last farewell message to the elders of the Ephesian Church beginning in verse 17 and continuing through verse 35. We see in this verse how the elders obtained their position and from whom they received their office by the Holy Ghost. We see also what their duty is to feed the Church of God. The next two or three verses carry the thought that their feeding of the flock needs to contain an ingredient of teaching and warning concerning those who might come in among them or even some who were among them then, who would arise speaking perverse things to draw away some from the congregation to follow them. The elders or overseers are charged with the responsibility of watching for any signs of approaching danger for the flock and to sound out an admonition to the saints concerning it. Hebrews 13:17 says that "...They watch for your souls, as they that must give account,...." In Acts 20:28, Paul charges the elders of the Ephesian Church to "Take heed unto yourselves,..." This was the first charge to them; then to take heed to the souls committed tot heir charge. From verse 13 through 19 he has been reminding them of his work among them; he had faithfully taught them publicly and privately from house to house by day and by night and had kept back nothing that was profitable to them and therefore he was free from the blood of all men. Then he said "Take heed THEREFORE unto yourselves,..." That word THEREFORE is important here. In other words, you have my example of my work among you to go by. Use that as a pattern for your work with the souls committed to your charge and go forth and be faithful to your post.

In I Peter 5:2-3, we read Peter's exhortation to elders, "Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock." We see here Peter is giving the same instruction to the elders that Paul gave in Acts 20:28, "...Feed the church of God,...." It is clear and evident that God wants the saints well-fed and instructed in the ways of truth and righteousness and well-warned and admonished concerning things that would affect them wrongfully and to avoid all such things. Let all of us to whom God has committed to our trust (Paul said "...He counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry. I Timothy 1:12.) be faithful at our post and serve Him in humility and fear so long as He places us in this responsibility.

I wish to return now to Hebrews 13:17 and note a few points in regard to the ruler, overseer, pastor or guide (by whatever name you desire to call them all are scriptural). This verse says, "...They watch for your souls, as they that must give account,..." This identifies them with the watchmen referred to in Ezekiel 33:1-9. The first six verses refer to the nation at war and how they select a man for their watchman and what his duties are. If he sees the sword coming and blows the trumpet and sounds the warning, whether the people respond to it and prepare themselves for battle or not, the watchman has cleared himself no matter what happens to the people. But if he fails to blow the trumpet and sound the warning and the people are destroyed, their blood will be required at the watchman's hand. Then verse 7 says, "So thou, O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me." The first word of the verse, "So," means "in like manner." This had reference to literal Israel but it is also a type of spiritual Israel, the saints under the new covenant. God has appointed watchmen, overseers, rulers, pastors or guides over His people in this "new" age of time for the specific purpose to keep them warned, advised, admonished and instructed concerning things God reveals to them. If people will give heed to their pastor's admonitions and he faithfully warns them of impending danger it will be well with both them and their watchman. If they fail to heed the warnings given, and the enemy comes in and gains advantage over them, deceives and overthrows them, it will still be well with the faithful pastor but not for them. If the watchman fails to see what is happening and fails to give warning and evil comes upon the people, then their blood will be required at the watchman's hand.

So the watchman stands in a very responsible place and must be very sincere, diligent and faithful if he is to save his own soul. Also the congregation whom he serves must be very diligent and sincere to obey and submit themselves if they would save their souls. All things considered, it is easy to see why these instructions are given to obey and submit. God has placed them there for that specific purpose and people are helping on their own destruction and total ruin who take an independent stand on anything they have been admonished by God's man and fail to obey and submit themselves. Some have said, "If God tells me, I will accept it, but I will not accept it from man." But the advice from here is that if you take an attitude to discredit and discount the worth of God's man and say you are just going to get your direction from God Himself, I will almost guarantee you will come up with a grand deception and just go shouting your way right on to your own destruction and ruin. In Luke 10:16 Jesus said, "He that heareth you heareth me;..." He speaks through His men.

In I Peter 5:2 and Acts 20:28 we read that it is the duty and responsibility of the elders to feed the flock, the Church of God. It is the elders duty to always have something from God to feed, nourish, edify, strengthen, build up and inspire the souls of the people; also to admonish, instruct and enlighten them.

In Hebrews 13:17 where it says, "Obey them that have the rule over you,..." the margin says "Guide." The true man of God rules his flock or congregation by guiding and leading them and showing them how to fulfill the Word and will of God in their lives by performing it right before their eyes. In Philippians 3:17 Paul said, "Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for an ensample." Again in Philippians 4:9 Paul said, "Those things, which ye have both learned, and received, and heard, and SEEN in me, do: and the God of peace shall be with you." Peter writing to the elders in I Peter 5:3 said, "Neither as being lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock." And Paul wrote to Timothy, the pastor or overseer at Ephesus, in I Timothy 4:12, "Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity." Oh, how beautiful this is when a pastor can bring a message from God's Word on any line and when he has finished can say: "Now that is the message from God's Holy Word. You just watch me now and I will show you how to do it." I promise you that you can guide, lead and govern your congregations more successfully by this method than by being a lord over God's heritage and governing by dogmatic commands.

Then we see in Matthew 18:15-20 Jesus giving instructions and directions to His ministry for maintaining order and discipline in the Church. Clearly this is one of their major responsibilities. The instruction here is if a brother offends, go to him and tell him his fault between the two of you alone. If he refuses to hear you, take one or two more with you and go again. If he refuses to hear them, take it to the Church. And at this point the pastor and elders come into it and it is their responsibility to settle the matter equitably and right even if it comes to expelling the offending party from the fellowship of the Church. Jesus said He would put His seal and sanction on any judgment rendered by His spirit-filled men according to His Word. In verse 18 He said, "...Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." But the conclusion of the whole matter is in verse 20 where He said, "For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." It is Jesus executing judgment through His God-called, spirit-filled, Holy Spirit appointed men performing the work of God in their place.

In Matthew 16:19 Jesus said to Peter, "And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven:..." This was not just to Peter, but it was said in a direct conversation between Jesus and Peter so it has been taken that way by some. However, this applied to all the Apostles and all of their successors, (ministers of the Church of God) throughout this gospel age of time. Every God-called, God-qualified minister has those keys. They are God's Word and God's Holy Spirit. And all the work done through these agents has the seal and sanction of God and heaven upon the back of it.

We read in Ephesians 4:11-13, "And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ." We see here several classifications of ministry, all of whose work and place in the ministry are necessary in bringing the members of the body of Christ into the unity of faith and bringing them to full maturity and development in Christ and in their Christian experience.

The "apostle" is defined as a "planter." Paul, who was an apostle, said of himself and his work in I Corinthians 3:6, "I have planted,..." As we follow the work and ministry of Paul we see that he was perpetually and constantly reaching out into new, virgin territory planting the truth and establishing new churches. He said of his work in Romans 15:20, "Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation." We conclude, then, that the work of an apostle is to go into new territory and plant the gospel and gain converts to the Christian faith and establish churches. We may think of apostles as only the twelve apostles of Jesus. Truly they were a hand-picked special group selected by Jesus to be with Him during His ministry and death, resurrection and ascension; to plant the truth and establish the first Christian Church in Jerusalem. They were also to pilot it through its early stages and then after that in other outlying areas.

The second thing mentioned in Ephesians 4:11-13 is "prophets." This is another phase of God's ministry for the Church. We do not want to confuse the "prophets" in the New Testament Church nor endeavor to identify them with the "prophets" of Israel in Old Testament times. The New Testament prophet speaketh unto men to edification, exhortation and comfort. (I Corinthians 14:3.) This identifies him as a proclaimer of the gospel truth the same as all other ministers of the New Testament Church. Yet there is a difference in his ministry and the other classifications of ministers. He is different from the apostle, pastor or teacher, etc. But he is a man whom God can use in special purposes wherever they are. Sometimes they foretell future events also as in the case of Agabus. (Acts 11:27-30; 21:11.)

The third classification in Ephesians 4:11 is "evangelists." They are principally traveling ministers who go about to different established churches and sometimes where there are no churches. The main burden of their ministry is the saving of sinners and also to support the pastors and undergird them in their teaching and managing of their congregations.

The fourth classification is "pastors and teachers," which we have already considered extensively.

The important thing in this respect is for everyone who is called of God to the ministry to abide in the same calling wherein he is called. (I Corinthians 7:20.) It has sometimes been very detrimental and troublesome when one called and qualified in one phase of the ministry crosses over the line of his ministry and tries to exercise himself in another phase of ministry for which he has not been called and qualified. This can upset a lot of things. This kind of thing happens more often in evangelists crossing over their line of ministry and endeavoring to take the place of the pastor in his preaching. An evangelist can very well leave a pastor more problems and troubles than he had before he came if he does not behave himself wisely in the congregation. I would especially caution all evangelists not to dabble with problems in the congregation or counsel anyone involved in a problem with his pastor without bringing the pastor in on the counseling or you can very seriously deepen the problem and complicate matters more than they are.

Now let us consider some of the ordination of ministers, the method of ordination and what it means. I do understand it to have some definite, important meaning beyond a mere recognition of the call of God upon them. In Acts 13:2-3 we read, "As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabus and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them. And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away." This was a sacred, solemn charge to them and they fasted and prayed before they did it, even after the Holy Ghost had spoken to them. They wanted to be certain they were not mistaken. Ah, brethren, could we be a little admonished at this point and consider our ordination services as a more serious and solemn responsibility than we sometimes do. I feel deeply that I myself can.

I am sure that a token of recognition is a big support from the ministers with whom and among whom he is going to be working, but I feel the ordination service goes deeper than that and the laying on of hands by Holy Spirit filled men actually imports something to the one on whom their hands are laid. In I Timothy 4:14 we read, "Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery." Again in II Timothy 1:6 Paul said, "Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the gift of God, which is in thee by the putting on of my hands." Paul confirms in these two texts that there was actually something imparted to them by the laying on of hands by Holy Spirit filled men. I feel we should teach this to our people and especially to the candidates for ordination and prepare them to expect to receive something special from God when the hands of Holy Ghost filled ministers are laid on them.
 

(Top of Page)


 
Elders in the Church

Question: Who are the elders in the Church? When are they elders? Does ordination have anything to do with being an elder? What is a bishop and what is a deacon? If a minister has a rebellious child, does that take away his gift?

Answer: We have several questions in one here, but they are all related, so maybe we can discuss them all together.

It seems apparent from the Scriptures that the term "Elder" and the term "Bishop" are used interchangeably and apply to the same officer in the Church. We are not to confuse the present use of the term "Bishop" with what it was in the early Church of the Apostolic period. F. G. Smith in his book The Revelation Explained, on page 94, quotes from the historian Waddington who says, "...and it is even certain that the terms 'Bishop,' 'Elder' and 'Presbyter' were, in the first instances, and for a short period, sometimes used synonymously, and indiscriminately applied to the same order in the ministry." On page 95 of the same book he quotes from the historian Milman who says, "The earliest Christian communities appear to have been ruled and represented, in the absence of the apostle who was their first founder, by their elders, who are likewise called bishops, or overseers of the church." Further he quotes from D'Aubigne's History of the Reformation on page 96, "The church was in the beginning a community of brethren, guided by a few of the brethren." And again, "All Christians were priests of the living God, with humble pastors as their guides."

It will be noted in all these quotations from these historians that they are going back to the beginning and describing how it was then. That is what we must do to get a proper understanding of these officers in the Church and their functions. We can certainly be sure that when the Church was brand-new and fresh from the hand of God that it would be perfect and exactly like He wanted it. As it was then, so must it be now. We must go back to the beginning of the New Testament Church for our pattern and not allow our vision to be clouded by all the paraphernalia that has been attached to these terms by ambitious and aspiring men down through the apostasy and the Dark Ages and their present day usage which has come on down to us from that time.

The Holy Scriptures also attest to this. In Titus 1:5 we read Paul's instruction to Titus, "...set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee." Then verse seven says, "For a bishop must be blameless, etc." It is clear here that the terms "Elder" and "Bishop" are used interchangeably.

We find in Titus 1:6 that the qualifications for an "Elder" (Bishop) is that he must have faithful children not accused of riot or unruly, and in I Timothy 3:4 we read, "One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity." But these are conditions that change. Sometimes unruly children through the prayers of their parents and the saints, settle down and behave better. Sometimes they become more rebellious and leave home. In different ways these conditions may change. Also, they have been known to get saved, shape up and do well. So, let us not give up on them, but pray for them and be all the help to them and their parents that we can. Perchance God may undertake in the matter and solve the problem in the best way and to the best interest of all parties involved.

I would hesitate to say that a minister having a rebellious child would cause his gift to be taken away. However, if conditions became bad enough it would perhaps shut him down in the exercise of his gift for the time being until conditions changed to clear him for going ahead in his calling.

In Acts 20:17 we read concerning Paul, "And from Miletus he sent to Ephesus, and called the elders of the church." We see here that at least some congregations had a plurality of elders more than just one. Also, in verse 28 of this chapter we learn something else about the elders the most important thing. That is that they were divinely appointed and qualified by the Holy Ghost and that they were the overseers of the Church of God. Their specified duty in this verse was to "...feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood." Also in the next three verses they are warned about some who would come in among them, and some of their own number who would break rank, and draw away disciples after them. These elders are charged with the responsibility of watching and standing guard over the Church and protecting it against schisms and divisions, false and erroneous doctrines. In I Peter 5:1-3, Peter is exhorting the "Elders" (it is important to note that he also classifies himself as an "Elder" even though he was an "Apostle") and he exhorts them to "feed the flock of God" and take "the oversight thereof." Verse three, "Neither as being lords [not overruling margin] over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock." Paul declared in II Corinthians 1:24 that he did not have dominion over their faith, but was a helper of their joy. Some unwise and overruling pastors require things of people which are beyond their faith, light, understanding and experience to which they have attained, and discourage them and crush their spirits. Instead, they should teach them in love and sympathy and set a good example before them of those things to which they desire them to attain. Again in Hebrews 13:17 we read, "Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give an account,..." Where this text says "Rule over you," the margin says, "Guide." One of the principal ways that a pastor rules over his congregation is in teaching them from God's Word in precept and then showing them how it works by a good example of what he is teaching. These texts all set forth the work of an "Elder" and his responsibilities and duties and also his authority.

It has already been noted that an "Elder" is appointed, qualified and empowered by the Holy Ghost. But a recognition of his call and qualifications for this work which is known as "ordination" is also taught in the Scriptures. This is usually done by the laying on of hands of other ministers. Paul wrote to Titus to "...Ordain elders in every city,..." Titus 1:5. Paul also wrote to Timothy to stir up the gift of God which was in him by the putting on of his hands. II Timothy 1:6. I Timothy 4:14 says, "Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery." In Acts 13:2-3 we read, "As they ministered to the Lord and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them. And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away." Then verse four says, "So they, being sent forth by the Holy Ghost,..." All these texts make it clear that the Holy Ghost is the One who calls, sends, endows with gifts and qualifies "Elders," and also that the Holy Ghost Himself wants the other ministers to recognize what He has done and to signify it by the sign of laying on of their hands. It is certain that any minister can feel freer in the exercise of his ministry and work more effectually when he knows that he has the recognition, support, backing and approval of the other ministers among whom he works and of the saints. For one to successfully fulfill the office of an "Elder" or "Overseer" in a congregation in all its aspects he should be ordained by the laying on of hands of other ordained ministers. He may preach just as well and feed the flock just as well without it, but when it comes to exercising authority and dealing with problems which may arise in the congregation, he will be much more effective and respected in his judgment if he has the recognition and backing of the ministry and the people he is dealing with know it. So I would say that one is a full-fledged "Elder," eligible to fulfill all the aspects of his office, when he is ordained by the laying on of hands of the presbytery.

In the early Church there were two classes of officers "Elders" and "Deacons." The "Elders" were in charge of the spiritual oversight and operation of the Church, while the "Deacons" were in charge of the temporal affairs of the Church and the administration of its charities, etc.

In the first four verses of the sixth chapter of Acts, we have the introduction of the office of "Deacon" into the Church. In this case a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews because their widows were neglected in the administration of the charities and care of them by the Church was taking place. In other words, they felt they were being discriminated against and that partiality was being shown. It is altogether possible that this was the case, since the Jerusalem Church was predominantly Jewish and they had not yet learned that all men were equal in God's sight and that there was neither Jew nor Greek in the body of Christ. When this murmuring reached the apostles, they called the whole company together and instructed them to choose out from among them seven men filled with the Holy Ghost and wisdom, and they would appoint them over this business, but they would give themselves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the Word. That was their job and they did not have time to attend to the administration of temporal matters. Verse six says that when these men were chosen and brought to the apostles they prayed and laid their hands on them. These men were ordained to administer in the office of a "Deacon" in that Jerusalem Church.

In the third chapter of I Timothy we have set forth the qualifications of a "Bishop" or "Elder" in the first seven verses. Then verses 8-13 set forth the qualifications of a "Deacon." You will notice there are some strict requirements on the "Deacon" as well as on the "Elder," and some of them are the same. God is very particular about any person who administers in any office in His Church. The deacons were required to be filled with the Holy Ghost the same as the elder was required to be Spirit filled. All who administer any office in the Church or occupy any position of leadership in the Church are to be Spirit-filled people.
 

(Top of Page)


 
The Office of the Bishop

Question: Does I Timothy 3:1 apply to any minister or just to bishops only?

Answer: This verse refers specifically to "bishops" and the following verses give a detailed outline of the qualifications of the man who is to fill that place. The New American Standard Version says, "If any man aspires to the office of overseer." Williams Version says, "...the office of pastor." King James says, "If any man desire the office of a bishop." This makes it clear that the "bishop" is the overseer or pastor in a congregation. The catalog of qualifications given in this case are strict and are calculated to protect and establish the bishop's (pastor's) right to speak on any and all matters even in dealing with members of his congregation on real close points as a pastor must do at times. But there may be those, and I am sure there are, whom God has His hand on and is using in a good way to proclaim His gospel and edify the church and win souls for Him whom we might not consider eligible to fill the responsible place of a "bishop" pastor or overseer of a congregation. It surely would be clear to all that the pastor has a unique calling and fills a unique place in and to the church where he pastors and that his qualifications would be more strict than for a "lay preacher" or someone else working for God in other capacities.

 

(Top of Page)


 
Bearing the Name 'Bishop'

Question: Is it right for one to be bearing "Bishop" as a name?

Answer: I presume the questioner in this case has reference to "Bishop" as a title in connection with one's name such as, "Bishop John Doe." First of all I would point out to all of us that we should never identify the scriptural term "Bishop" in the New Testament with the term as used in modern Christendom with all its attached pomp and preeminence. They are far different in their usage and meaning. It would certainly be wrong for an humble saint minister to attach that title to his name in its modern usage and meaning.

However, the term "Bishop" is a scriptural term found different times in the New Testament and in connection with "Overseer," "Oversight," and "Elder" all of which derive from the same root word. These words occur a number of times in the New Testament, and refer to the same office. "Bishop" does refer to an office in the Church and not to any particular individual. In I Timothy 3:1, Paul says, "...If a man desire the OFFICE of a bishop, he desireth a good work." I do not recall any of our brother ministers attaching the term "Bishop" to their name so I am not used to it and it would probably cause me a little shock and a little raising of my eyebrows and wrinkling of my forehead to see it. However, several of our brethren have attached the term "Elder" to their names which is the same thing.

In Titus 1:5, Paul says, "For this cause left I thee,...that thou shouldest...ordain ELDERS in every city,..." Then Titus 1:7 says, "For a BISHOP must be blameless, as the steward of God;..." It is evident here that "Elder" in verse 5 and "Bishop" in verse 7 are used interchangeably and refer to the same office. We also see here that a "Bishop" was the "Steward" of God. In I Corinthians 4:1, Paul declares himself to be a minister of Christ and "Steward" of the mysteries of God. Then Paul was a "Bishop" though he never attached that term as such to his name. Paul continues in I Corinthians 4:2, "Moreover it is required in STEWARDS, that a man be found faithful." In I Timothy 1:12 he said again, "And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that he counted me FAITHFUL, putting me into the ministry." Again in Luke 12:42 we read, "And the Lord said, Who then is that FAITHFUL and wise STEWARD, whom his lord shall make ruler over his household, to give them their portion of meat in due season?" This verse is important because it makes it clear what the duties of a "Steward" ("Bishop") are to give the household of God their portion of meat in due season. Or as Peter puts it in I Peter 5:2, "Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight [or "Bishopric"] thereof,..." He continues in verse 3, "Neither as being lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock."

Oh, how different this is from the modern ecclesiastical "Bishop" in his pomp, preeminence and position of "LORD" over God's heritage. In Luke 12:43 Jesus said further concerning the "FAITHFUL" and good "Steward" (Bishop), "Blessed is that servant, whom his Lord when he cometh shall find so doing." Paul said in Titus 1:7 that a "Bishop" was the "Steward" of God and in Luke 12:42-43 the term "Steward" (Bishop) is used. These terms are used interchangeably which makes it clear that a scriptural Bishop is a servant not a lord.

I will say again in closing that I have never known of any of the brethren attaching the term "Bishop" to their name or signature. Neither do I recall any place in the New Testament of any of those brethren using it either such as Bishop Paul, Bishop Peter, Bishop Timothy, etc. though all of these were Bishops. We have one case where Peter referred to himself as an "Elder" (I Peter 5:1) and "Bishop" and "Elder" were interchangeable terms in the New Testament usage and referred to the same office (Titus 1:5 and 7). However, I think that perhaps Peter referred to himself as an "Elder" here not so much to emphasize his eldership as to equate himself with the other elders. His statement here is, "The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder,..." He was placing himself right among them and not above them.

Some of the brethren have used the term "Elder" and some "Pastor" attached to their name and signature. I think the most of them just sign their name without any other identifying term attached at all. I don't know that we could have any scriptural quarrel with anyone who used any of these terms Bishop, Elder, or Pastor in their signature because they are all scriptural terms and identify the office and position of the individual. Perhaps the reason our brethren have not used the term "Bishop" is because of the pomp, honor, and position it signifies in the modern religious world today which is entirely foreign and strange to the humble, lowly servants of the Church to whom it was applied in the New Testament.
 

(Top of Page)


 
Neither as Being Lords Over God's Heritage

Question: Please explain I Peter 5:1-3; especially verse 3 which says, "Neither as being lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock." How could a pastor or minister be a lord over God's heritage?

Answer: I Peter 5:1-3 reads: "The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed: Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock."

The reference here to "elders" refers to the office in the church (pastor, bishop, presbyter, overseer). The first thing I wish to notice is how different this actually is from the claim of the Catholic church that Peter was the first bishop or pope (official head of the church). He presents himself here as just an elder among other elders, and makes no ambiguous claim to any special position among them at all. His only claim of distinction is that he was a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed. This was the requirement for apostleship (Acts 1:21-22), and Peter was one of the twelve apostles. Perhaps the other elders he addressed here were not, which gave him a degree of distinction among them. But it still remains that he presented himself as an elder among elders and made no reference to his being an apostle. There was an humble quality among those first ministers of the Christian church. Jesus taught His disciples this. In Matthew 20:25-27 we read: "But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant." Then in verse 28 He presents Himself as the pattern, example, or model and said, "Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many." The idea of promoting one minister above others and attaching clerical and ecclesiastical titles to his name was reserved for the apostate church in a later time as it slipped into apostasy on its way into the dark ages and the establishment of the "man of sin" (II Thessalonians 2:3-4) as the universal head of the church. Exalting of ministers above other ministers was the path that led to this. Paul referred to it as "the mystery of iniquity" in II Thessalonians 2:7. John referred to one, Diotrephes, who loved to have preeminence in the church (III John 9), and denounced him for this.

In I Peter 5:2, Peter gives this charge to these elders: "Feed the flock of God which is among you,..." It is the duty of all pastors to feed the souls of his congregation on the pure, unadulterated Word of God. In John 21:15-17, Jesus charged Peter three times to feed His sheep and His lambs. In Acts 20:28, Paul charged the elders of Ephesus, "Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood." Therefore, it is clearly the pastor's duty and responsibility to feed the souls of his congregation.

Continuing on in verse 2, Peter states that the pastor or elder is to accept his office and responsibility of the congregation not by constraint (coercion or pressure), but willingly (God loves willing service). They are not to have money as a prime objective but are to serve with a ready mind. Paul also gives this as a required qualification for a bishop (I Timothy 3:3) or elder (Titus 1:7). ("Bishop" and "elder" are interchangeable and the same scripturally). In these two texts Paul says they are not to be given to or greedy of filthy lucre (money).

Then verse 3 says, "Neither as being lords over God's heritage [the margin here says "overruling"], but being ensamples to the flock." The pastor is not to be a tyrant, despot or overlord, but is to be a shepherd, feeder, and helper of his flock. Paul says in II Corinthians 1:24, "Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy: for by faith ye stand." We see that we are not to domineer over them or dominate their lives and faith but are to faithfully teach them the standards of God's Word. We are to help them by every means available to us to grow and mature in their faith and experience; but in the meantime, while they are coming to the full standard, not be chastising them all the time for not being up to it.

The true pastor will teach his congregation the principles of truth in the New Testament. Then he will say to them, "This now is the instruction and this is how you do it. Just watch me now and see how it works." He is to be the example for them. Paul said in Philippians 3:17, "Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for an ensample." Again in Galatians 1:15-16, Paul said, "But when it pleased God, who...called me by his grace, To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen;..." What a great truth is expressed here! Paul realized that he was not qualified to preach Christ until he could reveal Christ. Neither is anyone else. Again in Philippians 4:9, Paul says, "Those things, which ye have both learned, and received, and heard, and seen in me, do: and the God of peace shall be with you." Note: They had seen in him what they had heard from him. If a minister preaches a standard that he cannot produce a good example of but, at the same time, chastises his congregation if they are short of it, is an example of one of the ways in which he overrules or exercises lordship over them.

Read Ezekiel 34:1-10, and get a good, clear, concise picture of an unfaithful minister (pastor) who is a lord over God's heritage. Verse 3 says the shepherds eat the fat and clothe themselves with wool but feed not the flock. Verse 8 says they feed themselves but feed not the flock. Verse 4 says they have not strengthened the diseased, healed the sick, bound up the broken, brought back those who were driven away, sought the lost; but they have ruled with force and cruelty. What a sad state for a congregation who has a pastor who does not take care of their needs and is always demanding more of them but actually doing less for them.

How different this is from the true, humble pastors whom the Holy Ghost appoints as overseers of congregations. They rule over them by guiding them (Hebrews 13:17) and showing them how the gospel works out in their own lives.
 

(Top of Page)


 
Shepherds in Ezekiel 34

Question: Please comment on Ezekiel 34:2-6 (Who are these shepherds?); also taking into consideration verse 12 "The cloudy and dark day."

Answer: The shepherds spoken of in these verses would be those whom God had appointed to guide, care for, and feed His flock, the children of Israel. This would refer to their priests and prophets. Also in this case, since Israel's government was a combination of church and state, it might include their kings and rulers as well. These were all set over the children of Israel to seek their welfare and best interest and to guide them in both sacred and secular things. We get a good view of the Good Shepherd in the 23rd Psalm. We see the Good Shepherd here providing all the wants of His sheep, leading them to the still waters and providing for them security and sufficiency so that they lie down in peace in green pastures. He never forsakes His flock but is with them in trouble and adversity the same as in prosperity which is evidenced by His walking with them through the valley of the shadow of death. He always provides abundance for them even to the overflowing stage and sets them a table right in the presence of their enemies.

In John 10:11, Jesus declares Himself to be the Good Shepherd and declares that the Good Shepherd giveth His life for the sheep. Then in verse 12 He speaks of the hireling, whose own the sheep are not, and when he sees the wolf coming he leaves the sheep and fleeth; the wolf catches the sheep and scatters them. Jesus further explained in verse 13 that the reason the hireling flees when danger and trouble threatens is because he is just a hireling and is primarily interested in his hire and temporal gain and does not care for the sheep.

Again in Luke 15:3-7, Jesus presents another graphic picture of a Good Shepherd looking after his sheep. He has a hundred sheep and one wanders away and gets lost. He leaves the ninety-nine in the fold and goes in search of the lost one until he finds it; then he puts it on his shoulder and carries it home. He cares for all his sheep and when one is in trouble, that is the one he seeks to help.

These shepherds spoken of in Ezekiel 34:2-6, were supposed to be like this and like the Good Shepherd of John 10:11, and the Shepherd featured in the twenty-third Psalm. But, oh, how different they were! They were like the hireling Jesus mentioned in John 10:12-13, and were looking after their own comforts and gain. They were entirely insensitive to the needs of the flock. They did not strengthen the diseased, heal the sick, bind up the broken, bring back those who were driven away, nor seek that which was lost. They ruled with force and cruelty. They were totally unfaithful and entirely insensitive to their responsibility as shepherds of a flock. As a result, the sheep were scattered and wandered through all the mountains and high hills of the whole earth and became meat to be devoured by the beasts of the field. This all actually happened to the children of Israel again and again because of their wickedness and idolatry which was instigated by their priests, prophets, and rulers. It is also a type of what has happened to the people of God (spiritual Israel) during this gospel dispensation and has a second fulfillment there.

In Isaiah 9:16, we read, "For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed." Again we read in Isaiah 3:12, "...O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." In Jeremiah 23, beginning with verse 9 is a strong indictment against the prophets and priests of Israel. Verse 11 says, "For both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in my house have I found their wickedness, saith the Lord." We also read in verse 13, "And I have seen folly in the prophets of Samaria; they prophesied in Baal, and caused my people Israel to err." Clear on down through verse 32 God is strongly proclaiming against the prophets who prophesy in His name declaring that "the Lord hath said," but they prophesy lies and falsehoods.

The awful consequences of all this false prophesying and the profanity among priests and prophets are found in Jeremiah 14:13-16, which I will insert here. "Then said I, Ah, Lord God! behold, the prophets say unto them, Ye shall not see the sword, neither shall ye have famine; but I will give you assured peace in this place. Then the Lord said unto me, The prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent them not, neither have I commanded them, neither spake unto them: they prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of naught, and the deceit of their heart. Therefore thus saith the Lord concerning the prophets that prophesy in my name, and I sent them not, yet they say, Sword and famine shall not be in this land; By sword and famine shall those prophets be consumed. And the people to whom they prophesy shall be cast out in the streets of Jerusalem because of the famine and the sword;..." It becomes apparent here that the people who listen to the prophets who prophesy falsehoods and offer security in those falsehoods and doctrines that are not according to God's Word, shall become victims of those prophets (be devoured by the beasts of the field the false prophets) and share the same fate with them.

In Hosea 5:10 it says, "The princes of Judah were like them that remove the bound: therefore I will pour out my wrath upon them like water." A few other texts regarding landmarks and bounds will add a little emphasis to this text where it says "The princes of Judah were like them that remove the bound." When the Israelites entered into Canaan land, everyone received an inheritance consisting of a piece of land secured by bounds and landmarks. This was to remain in that family throughout their generation. This inheritance was considered such a valuable and sacred thing that the daughters of one tribe were forbidden to marry into another tribe because it would affect their inheritance which was not transferable to any other tribe. In Deuteronomy 27:17 a curse was pronounced upon anyone who tampered with the landmark and altered the bounds of his neighbor's field. Also read Proverbs 22:28 and Deuteronomy 19:14. We see this was a very strong charge against the princes of Judah who were like them that removed the bound. The princes of Judah would be their prophets, priests, and rulers. They had tampered with God's Word and law, and prophesied falsely to the people and led them into error and idolatry, and God's wrath was against them.

This whole discussion describes the class and condition of the shepherds in Ezekiel 34, and the awful consequences of their lordship over the people. It will be necessary to wait until another time to consider the other part of the question, "the cloudy and dark day."

 

(Top of Page)


 
Backslidden Ministers

Question: Please explain Romans 11:29. Does this mean that if God calls a person into the ministry or for any other phase of the work of God and endows him with gifts suitable to his call; if that person backslides his gifts and calling still continue on even after he has backslidden?

Answer: The answer to this question is a resounding "NO." The text in the question has no reference at all to Divine calls and gifts of the Spirit in the operation of the New Testament Church. But this text refers to God's purposes and plans concerning Israel and the covenant and promises made with their fathers. The full text reads: "For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance." Verse 28 says of the Jews that "...they are beloved for the fathers' sakes." "The fathers" in this text refers to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. To these men God gave a covenant incorporating some broad, sweeping promises; first to Abraham and then confirming them with Isaac and Jacob, heirs together with him of the same promises.

The covenant and promise made to these men have a far-reaching importance, so let us look at them a little. In Genesis 12:1, we have the call of Abraham to separate himself from his father's house and his kindred and go to a land that He would show him. In Genesis 12:2 He promised to make of him a great nation and bless him and make him a blessing and to make his name great. Then Genesis 12:3 is the all-important promise, "...In thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." This is very far-reaching. In Genesis 18:18 is another reference to this same promise but this text uses the term "all nations" instead of "all families" as in Genesis 12:3. In Genesis 17:19 God said to Abraham that his wife, Sarah, would bear him a son and he should call his name "Isaac." He further said He would establish His covenant with him and with his seed after and it would be an everlasting covenant. And in Genesis 21:12 God told Abraham that "...In Isaac shall thy seed be called." And again in Genesis 22:18 God said to Abraham "And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice."

Now it must be evident from these statements that it was God's original plan and purpose to bless and provide the blessing of salvation to the whole world (Gentiles all nations the same as the Jews) and this was to be brought about through Abraham's seed. Now a reference to Galatians 3:16 will throw a bright light on all of this. "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ."

It must be clear, then, that the ultimate end of the covenant with Abraham and all its promises transcended centuries and ages and cut right straight through to Jesus Christ and terminated in Him.

So let us back up a little now to the call of Abraham to leave his father's house and be separated from his kindred (Genesis 12:1). There was a distinct reason for this. The people where Abraham grew up, including Abraham's father and his household, were all idolaters. It may be assumed that Abraham himself worshiped idol gods and served them, too. We read in Joshua 24:2 "...Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham,...and they served other gods." Verse 3 continues and says "And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood,..." We see here that God was not pleased to establish His covenant of salvation and grace with a people serving and worshipping idol gods. So He separated Abraham from them and revealed Himself to him until he knew and recognized Him as the true and living God and accepted Him as his God. Because he obeyed His voice and went out from his people as he was instructed to do and forsook his idol gods, God established His covenant with him and made him the head and beginning of a new race separated from all others. This was the Israelites and speaking of them in I Kings 8:53 Solomon said, "For thou didst separate them from among all the people of the earth, to be thine inheritance,..." Again in Deuteronomy 26:18 we read, "And the Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people, as he hath promised thee and that thou shouldest keep all his commandments." And finally in II Samuel 7:24 we read, "For thou hast confirmed to thyself thy people Israel to be a people unto thee for ever: and thou, Lord, art become their God."

It was through this line, this separated, distinctive, holy, peculiar, separated unto the Lord line, that the Messiah was to come; the SEED of Abraham in whom all the nations of the world were to be blessed. God chose and separated Israel unto Himself for this particular, specific purpose. Several times Israel was in severe crisis and threatened with extinction, but God most miraculously and in most unexpected ways intervened and preserved and sustained them until time for Christ to be born and presented to the world. God's Word said in Genesis 49:10, "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be." Even though they were a conquered and subjected people under the Romans when Christ was born, yet their political system and religious system were still pretty much intact and they were permitted a measure of freedom to operate their system among themselves. To this extent Genesis 49:10 was fulfilled and God had succeeded in bringing this line through intact and accomplishing His purpose for getting His Son into the world.

Soon after the life and ministry of Christ (70 A.D.) the Jewish nation with their capitol city, Jerusalem, and the Jewish polity was totally and most miserably destroyed but not until He had carried out His plan and accomplished His purpose through them. But in all of this there was no repenting, withdrawing, or changing of plan or purpose on God's part. He accomplished what He had in mind to accomplish in them. Neither was there any breaking of any of God's promises to them in forsaking them and permitting them to be so miserably destroyed without His aid. True, God had promised to be with them and not forsake them. In Hebrews 13:5 a reference is made to this promise "...I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee." But right along with that promise He also said, "If you forsake me, I will forsake you." (II Chronicles 15:2, 24:20; Deuteronomy 31:16-17.) When the Jews filled up their cup of iniquity in rejecting God's Son and crucifying Him and had utterly forsaken God; then He abandoned and forsook them as a people and let them miserably perish. But He had faithfully warned them of this several times and was thoroughly justified in abandoning them. They ceased to be a special people unto God at that time and will never be such again.
 

(Top of Page)


 
Ministers, Doctors, Hospitals, and Medicine

Question: What should be the position of the Church of God and saints in general in regard to ministers and gospel workers who willingly submit themselves into the hands of doctors and go to hospitals or resort to medicines? Would it be thought conceivable that God would instruct such an one to submit to doctors, etc.?

Answer: Divine healing has been a fundamental, cardinal doctrine of the Church of God from its inception on the Day of Pentecost and throughout this dispensation of time down to now. In Act. 5:12 we read of many signs and wonders being wrought among the people by the hands of the apostles. Verse 15 tells of them bringing forth the sick and laying them on beds and couches in the street in order that the shadow of Peter might pass over them that they might be healed. Verse 16 tells of many people from the cities roundabout bringing their sick folks into Jerusalem, and they were every one healed. The Church started out this way, and everywhere the gospel of the kingdom has been preached, both then and all along through the ages of time until now, it has been accompanied by healing of the sick. The preaching of the gospel and divine healing have always gone hand in hand they are actually components one of another.

The doctrine of divine healing was taught and practiced by all the early ministers of this Evening Light Reformation, and is still taught and practiced by the true ministers of God today. My parents were both among the early pioneer ministers of the Evening Light Reformation, and I had first hand knowledge from them as to how this doctrine was taught and practiced among them. They taught that saints should trust God with their bodies as well as their souls, and it was God's will and plan to heal His people without the aid of doctors and medicines in answer to the prayer of faith. This has been the code that true saints of God have lived by throughout this age of time. God has set His seal to it, and has healed every kind of sickness and disease in the books, and has confirmed the preaching of this doctrine with signs following.

It has always been considered substandard for saints in light to resort to medical remedies and treatment, and still is. There are too many among us today going to hospitals and dying there in the hands of the doctors. This is not according to God's Word. Because of this, we are being robbed of victories and the manifestation of God's power and glory in our midst. But when ministers do these things, what shall we say? What can we say in behalf of those who have persevered in their faith, died in the faith, and refused to accept deliverance from pain, sickness, and death by human aid in order to please God and hold their integrity with Him? Consider the young saints who have laid their lives on the line to trust God and be faithful to Him in times of severe and potentially fatal sickness young mothers and fathers trusting God with their families as well as their own lives, and have persevered and gone down to the bars of death trusting in the Lord. Then God came and healed them, raised them up, and now they sit in the service listening to someone preach who has been in the hospital and maybe had an operation, etc. What shall we say; what can we say to people like that in such a case? Folks, it cannot be that we would ever represent folks as being in good standing who do these things and lower the standard of truth in this way until they have properly cleared themselves.

F. G. Smith, in his book What the Bible Teaches, on page 197 (chapter ten, "Divine Healing"), says, "This blessed truth is established in the Word of God." Then he continues, "This doctrine has been ignored by many; but 'what if some did not believe? Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?' (Romans 3:3.) It is not what men believe or do not believe that is to settle the great facts of truth, but it is what the Word of God says."

The healing which was to characterize the life of Jesus Christ was prophesied in Isaiah 35:3-6, Isaiah 53:4-5, and in many other Old Testament scriptures. These prophecies of Isaiah were declared to be fulfilled in the ministry of Jesus in Matthew 8:16-17 where it says, "When the even was come, they brought unto him many that were possessed with devils: and he cast out the spirits with his word, and healed all that were sick: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying, Himself took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses." And we also read in Matthew 4:24, "And his (Jesus') fame went throughout all Syria: and they brought unto him all sick people that were taken with divers diseases and torments, and those which were possessed with devils, and those which were lunatick, and those that had the palsy: and he healed them."

Jesus also delegated this power and authority to cast out devils, heal the sick, and preach the kingdom of God when He sent forth His twelve disciples (Matthew 10:1; Mark 6:12-13). He also delegated this same power and authority to seventy others when He sent them forth in Luke 10:1-9. In fact, Jesus delegated to the Church, His body, and especially its ministry, this power and authority to heal the sick and cast out devils, as well as other miraculous things. This was a permanent arrangement throughout this gospel age of time. The commission as given in Mark 16:15-18, states this: "And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved;... And these signs shall follow them that believe;... they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover." Do we believe that the part of Jesus' commission which says, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved" is still in effect today? Surely, we do. But what foundation do we have for believing this and not believe also that part of the same commission which says that they who believe "shall lay hands on the sick and they shall recover" is also in effect today? Surely, the commission that Jesus gave shall stand in its entirety in all of its parts until the end of the world. Hebrews 13:8 says, "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, to day, and for ever."

In James 5:14-15, we read these instructions to the Church after it was set up and operating: "Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up;..."

Yes, the doctrine of divine healing is well founded in the Holy Scriptures throughout. This is what God's ministers are to preach and teach to the people. But if we are going to preach it, we must also practice it and demonstrate its work ability. The Word of God says, "The husbandman that laboreth must be first partaker of the fruits." II Timothy 2:6. The ministers are to be ensamples to the flock (I Peter 5:3); teach them what to do and then show them how to do it.

This doctrine taught so general and generously throughout the New Testament is being grossly corrupted in our day. We have a parallel of this in the corrupting of the gospel in regard to salvation in the New Testament. Paul was preaching the pure gospel of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ only without any human works attached to it. The Judaizers in Paul's day accepted Christ as the Messiah, but they connected to that circumcision and the works of the law, without which they said people could not be saved. This was a corruption of the pure gospel of salvation which Paul was preaching, and it was in this area that he had his greatest conflicts. In II Corinthians 2:17 Paul declared himself to be not of the number which corrupted the Word of God.

We have the same principle at work here in our day in corrupting the Word of God with regard to the doctrine of healing. It is held that God gave us physicians and gave them skill, knowledge, and understanding of the human body to be able to help us in our sicknesses. Oh, of course, we say, they have their limits, but they do what they can do and then God does the actual healing. Is this not the same corrupting principle that Paul encountered in his day regarding salvation? But I say, if God has to do the real healing in the final analysis of the case, why not let Him do it all in the first place and not get any human works mixed in with it? Let God get all the glory and we get all the inspiration and blessing that comes with this work of God upon us. This is God's plan and purpose for bringing about a closer relationship between His children and Himself.

 

(Top of Page)


 
Gifts and Calling of God are Without Repentance

Question: Please explain Romans 11:29. Does this mean that if God calls a person into the ministry or for any other phase of the work of God and endows him with gifts suitable to his call; if that person backslides his gifts and calling still continue on even after he has backslidden?

Answer: The answer to this question is a resounding "NO." The text in the question has no reference at all to Divine calls and gifts of the Spirit in the operation of the New Testament Church. But this text refers to God's purposes and plans concerning Israel and the covenant and promises made with their fathers. The full text reads: "For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance." Verse 28 says of the Jews that "...they are beloved for the fathers' sakes." "The fathers" in this text refers to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. To these men God gave a covenant incorporating some broad, sweeping promises; first to Abraham and then confirming them with Isaac and Jacob, heirs together with him of the same promises.

The covenant and promise made to these men have a far-reaching importance, so let us look at them a little. In Genesis 12:1, we have the call of Abraham to separate himself from his father's house and his kindred and go to a land that He would show him. In Genesis 12:2 He promised to make of him a great nation and bless him and make him a blessing and to make his name great. Then Genesis 12:3 is the all-important promise, "...In thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." This is very far-reaching. In Genesis 18:18 is another reference to this same promise but this text uses the term "all nations" instead of "all families" as in Genesis 12:3. In Genesis 17:19 God said to Abraham that his wife, Sarah, would bear him a son and he should call his name "Isaac." He further said He would establish His covenant with him and with his seed after and it would be an everlasting covenant. And in Genesis 21:12 God told Abraham that "...In Isaac shall thy seed be called." And again in Genesis 22:18 God said to Abraham "And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice."

Now it must be evident from these statements that it was God's original plan and purpose to bless and provide the blessing of salvation to the whole world (Gentiles all nations the same as the Jews) and this was to be brought about through Abraham's seed. Now a reference to Galatians 3:16 will throw a bright light on all of this. "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ."

It must be clear, then, that the ultimate end of the covenant with Abraham and all its promises transcended centuries and ages and cut right straight through to Jesus Christ and terminated in Him.

So let us back up a little now to the call of Abraham to leave his father's house and be separated from his kindred (Genesis 12:1). There was a distinct reason for this. The people where Abraham grew up, including Abraham's father and his household, were all idolaters. It may be assumed that Abraham himself worshiped idol gods and served them, too. We read in Joshua 24:2 "...Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham,...and they served other gods." Verse 3 continues and says "And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood,..." We see here that God was not pleased to establish His covenant of salvation and grace with a people serving and worshipping idol gods. So He separated Abraham from them and revealed Himself to him until he knew and recognized Him as the true and living God and accepted Him as his God. Because he obeyed His voice and went out from his people as he was instructed to do and forsook his idol gods, God established His covenant with him and made him the head and beginning of a new race separated from all others. This was the Israelites and speaking of them in I Kings 8:53 Solomon said, "For thou didst separate them from among all the people of the earth, to be thine inheritance,..." Again in Deuteronomy 26:18 we read, "And the Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people, as he hath promised thee and that thou shouldest keep all his commandments." And finally in II Samuel 7:24 we read, "For thou hast confirmed to thyself thy people Israel to be a people unto thee for ever: and thou, Lord, art become their God."

It was through this line, this separated, distinctive, holy, peculiar, separated unto the Lord line, that the Messiah was to come; the SEED of Abraham in whom all the nations of the world were to be blessed. God chose and separated Israel unto Himself for this particular, specific purpose. Several times Israel was in severe crisis and threatened with extinction, but God most miraculously and in most unexpected ways intervened and preserved and sustained them until time for Christ to be born and presented to the world. God's Word said in Genesis 49:10, "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be." Even though they were a conquered and subjected people under the Romans when Christ was born, yet their political system and religious system were still pretty much intact and they were permitted a measure of freedom to operate their system among themselves. To this extent Genesis 49:10 was fulfilled and God had succeeded in bringing this line through intact and accomplishing His purpose for getting His Son into the world.

Soon after the life and ministry of Christ (70 A.D.) the Jewish nation with their capitol city, Jerusalem, and the Jewish polity was totally and most miserably destroyed but not until He had carried out His plan and accomplished His purpose through them. But in all of this there was no repenting, withdrawing, or changing of plan or purpose on God's part. He accomplished what He had in mind to accomplish in them. Neither was there any breaking of any of God's promises to them in forsaking them and permitting them to be so miserably destroyed without His aid. True, God had promised to be with them and not forsake them. In Hebrews 13:5 a reference is made to this promise "...I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee." But right along with that promise He also said, "If you forsake me, I will forsake you." (II Chronicles 15:2, 24:20; Deuteronomy 31:16-17.) When the Jews filled up their cup of iniquity in rejecting God's Son and crucifying Him and had utterly forsaken God; then He abandoned and forsook them as a people and let them miserably perish. But He had faithfully warned them of this several times and was thoroughly justified in abandoning them. They ceased to be a special people unto God at that time and will never be such again.
 

(Top of Page)


 

The Gift of Miracles/Healing

Question: What is the gift of miracles? Does anyone have it? Is it not the same as the gift of healing as recorded in I Corinthians 12:9, 28, 29?

Answer: Miracle in the dictionary is defined as "An extraordinary event manifesting the supernatural work of God." And, of course, healing of sicknesses in answer to the prayer of faith without the aid of doctors and medicines would fall into this category and be included in this definition. The fact that they are mentioned separately in the scriptures referred to, seems to me sufficient evidence that the scriptures separate between healing and miracles and places them in different categories.

Sickness is defined as a disease, malady, disorder, illness, nausea, etc. This would include such things as tuberculosis, cancer, fevers of various kinds, polio, etc. Some sicknesses leave their marks and effects in the body such as blindness, deafness, deformed and undeveloped parts, as in the case of polio and various other weaknesses and disorders. Healing, it seems to me, would involve curing of the disease itself while it would involve a miracle to remove the effects of the sickness which remain in the body after the sickness itself is gone; such as restoring of sight to the blind, hearing to the deaf and restoring of the deformed and useless or crippled parts left as a result of polio after the polio is gone.

Miracles also reach out into areas beyond the category of healing, such as the expulsion of evil spirits (Acts 8:7 and Acts 16:18); the controlling of the elements such as Jesus calming the storm Mark 4:39; Peter's deliverance from prison Acts 12:5-10; and the release of the other apostles from prison Acts 5:17-23; feeding the multitudes with five loaves and two fishes Matthew 14:15-21; and seven loaves and a few fishes Matthew 15:32-38; raising the dead to life again Matthew 9:18-26 and Acts 9:36-41; the numerous instances of restoring sight to the blind, hearing to the deaf, making the lame to walk and the dumb to speak, etc., and such like: too numerous to mention.

And even though I may not know or be able to point out specifically someone who has this gift of miracles, yet I am sure there must be some who have it, as the church in the earth would be a crippled church operating without one of its parts without this gift. I urge that more of us would earnestly seek this gift as well as the others also. This is a gift of the Spirit given to the church and whoever will earnestly seek it and qualify for it may have it.
 

(Top of Page)

 

 

Copyright © 2005 - Church of God. All Rights Reserved.