|
|
| |
|
Bro. Ostis Wilson Jr.'s Commentary |
|
|
Ministers and Offices in the Church |
|
|
|
|
Questions Concerning . . . |
|
(Click on a heading to read
the respective article.) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Offices in the Church (Selection/
Duties/ Ordination)
Question: Will you please comment some on the different
parts of the ministry and other officers in the Church; the
methods of their selection, the method of certification or
ordination and procedure for this and their duties, etc.
Answer: This is a very big subject and I am certain I
will not be able to cover it in the space allotted to me in
this column, but perhaps I can produce a few important points
that might be helpful to the questioner. Though it is a very
large topic, it is a very beautiful one and I am glad for the
opportunity to present a few points on it for the
consideration of the readers.
First, let us realize that the human body which is used as a
model of the Body of Christ, the Church, throughout the 12th
chapter of I Corinthians and in many other scriptures of the
New Testament is the most complete, synchronized and most
completely harmonious in the functioning of all its parts of
any organism that there is. The reader may read the entire
chapter of I Corinthians 12; Romans 12:5; Ephesians 1:22-23
and Galatians 1:24 as they are all related to this point. God
fashioned, built and organized His Church on this model. But
to build a Church after this fashion (Matthew 16:18; Hebrews
8:2; Colossians 1:18) is to assemble the members of the Church
together to join them together by joints and bands (Colossians
2:19) and furnish it with organs and necessary facilities to
function as a unified body. To form the body of Christ, He has
brought together, in order, a number of persons, saved men and
women who have been saved and cleansed from sin by the blood
of Jesus, and put them together in an orderly, functional,
structured whole so they can function as a unit.
Then within this body He has provided a special, distinct
group of individuals called ministers with various gifts and
callings to meet the health needs of the body, and among other
things, to function as a kind of built-in, self-healing
facility so that the body may maintain a good, healthy
condition and function efficiently for its intended purpose a
soul-saving and a soul-nurturing institution. There is in the
human body a specified quantity of blood and in that blood are
numerous minute particles called corpuscles. The particular
function of certain of these corpuscles is to fight infection
and promote the healing process in any part where the body has
been hurt or has sustained a severe wound, bruise or injury.
The procedure is this: when such a thing happens in any part
of the body, the blood immediately rushes to that part
conveying these corpuscles to that area. These corpuscles just
come swarming into that particular trouble spot and
immediately set up a fight against the wound, bruise or
injury. The ministry that God has set in the Church serves the
body of Christ in a similar capacity. I saw this very
beautifully demonstrated at a time when an infectious
situation had developed in a certain area. An SOS call for
help was sent out. Ministers heard the call in far distant
places and in several states.
Those ministers were consecrated, dedicated men to God and His
cause and the body had been severely injured and was in
danger. When they received the call they immediately dropped
what they were doing and immediately arranged plans to travel.
Some came from a distance of 2500 miles and from several
different states and converged on the infectious area ready to
do battle with the infection and take steps to set up a
healing process of the condition. Not only did the ministers
respond in this case but the saints throughout this far-flung
area rallied to the emergency and on very short notice raised
sufficient money to cover the traveling expenses of all those
ministers traveling by plane from great distances. But a
severe emergency was existing, the body of Christ had received
a severe injury and was in danger and the situation
immediately set in motion the in-built self-healing agency
that God has set up in the body of Christ when He built it.
Actually nothing else mattered right then but to get there and
get the infection stopped and set up a healing process for the
condition.
In Acts 20:28 we read, "Take heed therefore unto yourselves,
and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made
you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath
purchased with his own blood." This verse is contained in
Paul's last farewell message to the elders of the Ephesian
Church beginning in verse 17 and continuing through verse 35.
We see in this verse how the elders obtained their position
and from whom they received their office by the Holy Ghost. We
see also what their duty is to feed the Church of God. The
next two or three verses carry the thought that their feeding
of the flock needs to contain an ingredient of teaching and
warning concerning those who might come in among them or even
some who were among them then, who would arise speaking
perverse things to draw away some from the congregation to
follow them. The elders or overseers are charged with the
responsibility of watching for any signs of approaching danger
for the flock and to sound out an admonition to the saints
concerning it. Hebrews 13:17 says that "...They watch for your
souls, as they that must give account,...." In Acts 20:28,
Paul charges the elders of the Ephesian Church to "Take heed
unto yourselves,..." This was the first charge to them; then
to take heed to the souls committed tot heir charge. From
verse 13 through 19 he has been reminding them of his work
among them; he had faithfully taught them publicly and
privately from house to house by day and by night and had kept
back nothing that was profitable to them and therefore he was
free from the blood of all men. Then he said "Take heed
THEREFORE unto yourselves,..." That word THEREFORE is
important here. In other words, you have my example of my work
among you to go by. Use that as a pattern for your work with
the souls committed to your charge and go forth and be
faithful to your post.
In I Peter 5:2-3, we read Peter's exhortation to elders, "Feed
the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight
thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy
lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God's
heritage, but being ensamples to the flock." We see here Peter
is giving the same instruction to the elders that Paul gave in
Acts 20:28, "...Feed the church of God,...." It is clear and
evident that God wants the saints well-fed and instructed in
the ways of truth and righteousness and well-warned and
admonished concerning things that would affect them wrongfully
and to avoid all such things. Let all of us to whom God has
committed to our trust (Paul said "...He counted me faithful,
putting me into the ministry. I Timothy 1:12.) be faithful at
our post and serve Him in humility and fear so long as He
places us in this responsibility.
I wish to return now to Hebrews 13:17 and note a few points in
regard to the ruler, overseer, pastor or guide (by whatever
name you desire to call them all are scriptural). This verse
says, "...They watch for your souls, as they that must give
account,..." This identifies them with the watchmen referred
to in Ezekiel 33:1-9. The first six verses refer to the nation
at war and how they select a man for their watchman and what
his duties are. If he sees the sword coming and blows the
trumpet and sounds the warning, whether the people respond to
it and prepare themselves for battle or not, the watchman has
cleared himself no matter what happens to the people. But if
he fails to blow the trumpet and sound the warning and the
people are destroyed, their blood will be required at the
watchman's hand. Then verse 7 says, "So thou, O son of man, I
have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore
thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me."
The first word of the verse, "So," means "in like manner."
This had reference to literal Israel but it is also a type of
spiritual Israel, the saints under the new covenant. God has
appointed watchmen, overseers, rulers, pastors or guides over
His people in this "new" age of time for the specific purpose
to keep them warned, advised, admonished and instructed
concerning things God reveals to them. If people will give
heed to their pastor's admonitions and he faithfully warns
them of impending danger it will be well with both them and
their watchman. If they fail to heed the warnings given, and
the enemy comes in and gains advantage over them, deceives and
overthrows them, it will still be well with the faithful
pastor but not for them. If the watchman fails to see what is
happening and fails to give warning and evil comes upon the
people, then their blood will be required at the watchman's
hand.
So the watchman stands in a very responsible place and must be
very sincere, diligent and faithful if he is to save his own
soul. Also the congregation whom he serves must be very
diligent and sincere to obey and submit themselves if they
would save their souls. All things considered, it is easy to
see why these instructions are given to obey and submit. God
has placed them there for that specific purpose and people are
helping on their own destruction and total ruin who take an
independent stand on anything they have been admonished by
God's man and fail to obey and submit themselves. Some have
said, "If God tells me, I will accept it, but I will not
accept it from man." But the advice from here is that if you
take an attitude to discredit and discount the worth of God's
man and say you are just going to get your direction from God
Himself, I will almost guarantee you will come up with a grand
deception and just go shouting your way right on to your own
destruction and ruin. In Luke 10:16 Jesus said, "He that
heareth you heareth me;..." He speaks through His men.
In I Peter 5:2 and Acts 20:28 we read that it is the duty and
responsibility of the elders to feed the flock, the Church of
God. It is the elders duty to always have something from God
to feed, nourish, edify, strengthen, build up and inspire the
souls of the people; also to admonish, instruct and enlighten
them.
In Hebrews 13:17 where it says, "Obey them that have the rule
over you,..." the margin says "Guide." The true man of God
rules his flock or congregation by guiding and leading them
and showing them how to fulfill the Word and will of God in
their lives by performing it right before their eyes. In
Philippians 3:17 Paul said, "Brethren, be followers together
of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for an
ensample." Again in Philippians 4:9 Paul said, "Those things,
which ye have both learned, and received, and heard, and SEEN
in me, do: and the God of peace shall be with you." Peter
writing to the elders in I Peter 5:3 said, "Neither as being
lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock."
And Paul wrote to Timothy, the pastor or overseer at Ephesus,
in I Timothy 4:12, "Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou
an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in
charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity." Oh, how beautiful
this is when a pastor can bring a message from God's Word on
any line and when he has finished can say: "Now that is the
message from God's Holy Word. You just watch me now and I will
show you how to do it." I promise you that you can guide, lead
and govern your congregations more successfully by this method
than by being a lord over God's heritage and governing by
dogmatic commands.
Then we see in Matthew 18:15-20 Jesus giving instructions and
directions to His ministry for maintaining order and
discipline in the Church. Clearly this is one of their major
responsibilities. The instruction here is if a brother
offends, go to him and tell him his fault between the two of
you alone. If he refuses to hear you, take one or two more
with you and go again. If he refuses to hear them, take it to
the Church. And at this point the pastor and elders come into
it and it is their responsibility to settle the matter
equitably and right even if it comes to expelling the
offending party from the fellowship of the Church. Jesus said
He would put His seal and sanction on any judgment rendered by
His spirit-filled men according to His Word. In verse 18 He
said, "...Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in
heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed
in heaven." But the conclusion of the whole matter is in verse
20 where He said, "For where two or three are gathered
together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." It is
Jesus executing judgment through His God-called,
spirit-filled, Holy Spirit appointed men performing the work
of God in their place.
In Matthew 16:19 Jesus said to Peter, "And I will give unto
thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven:..." This was not just
to Peter, but it was said in a direct conversation between
Jesus and Peter so it has been taken that way by some.
However, this applied to all the Apostles and all of their
successors, (ministers of the Church of God) throughout this
gospel age of time. Every God-called, God-qualified minister
has those keys. They are God's Word and God's Holy Spirit. And
all the work done through these agents has the seal and
sanction of God and heaven upon the back of it.
We read in Ephesians 4:11-13, "And he gave some, apostles; and
some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and
teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of
the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Till we
all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of
the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the
stature of the fulness of Christ." We see here several
classifications of ministry, all of whose work and place in
the ministry are necessary in bringing the members of the body
of Christ into the unity of faith and bringing them to full
maturity and development in Christ and in their Christian
experience.
The "apostle" is defined as a "planter." Paul, who was an
apostle, said of himself and his work in I Corinthians 3:6, "I
have planted,..." As we follow the work and ministry of Paul
we see that he was perpetually and constantly reaching out
into new, virgin territory planting the truth and establishing
new churches. He said of his work in Romans 15:20, "Yea, so
have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was
named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation." We
conclude, then, that the work of an apostle is to go into new
territory and plant the gospel and gain converts to the
Christian faith and establish churches. We may think of
apostles as only the twelve apostles of Jesus. Truly they were
a hand-picked special group selected by Jesus to be with Him
during His ministry and death, resurrection and ascension; to
plant the truth and establish the first Christian Church in
Jerusalem. They were also to pilot it through its early stages
and then after that in other outlying areas.
The second thing mentioned in Ephesians 4:11-13 is "prophets."
This is another phase of God's ministry for the Church. We do
not want to confuse the "prophets" in the New Testament Church
nor endeavor to identify them with the "prophets" of Israel in
Old Testament times. The New Testament prophet speaketh unto
men to edification, exhortation and comfort. (I Corinthians
14:3.) This identifies him as a proclaimer of the gospel truth
the same as all other ministers of the New Testament Church.
Yet there is a difference in his ministry and the other
classifications of ministers. He is different from the
apostle, pastor or teacher, etc. But he is a man whom God can
use in special purposes wherever they are. Sometimes they
foretell future events also as in the case of Agabus. (Acts
11:27-30; 21:11.)
The third classification in Ephesians 4:11 is "evangelists."
They are principally traveling ministers who go about to
different established churches and sometimes where there are
no churches. The main burden of their ministry is the saving
of sinners and also to support the pastors and undergird them
in their teaching and managing of their congregations.
The fourth classification is "pastors and teachers," which we
have already considered extensively.
The important thing in this respect is for everyone who is
called of God to the ministry to abide in the same calling
wherein he is called. (I Corinthians 7:20.) It has sometimes
been very detrimental and troublesome when one called and
qualified in one phase of the ministry crosses over the line
of his ministry and tries to exercise himself in another phase
of ministry for which he has not been called and qualified.
This can upset a lot of things. This kind of thing happens
more often in evangelists crossing over their line of ministry
and endeavoring to take the place of the pastor in his
preaching. An evangelist can very well leave a pastor more
problems and troubles than he had before he came if he does
not behave himself wisely in the congregation. I would
especially caution all evangelists not to dabble with problems
in the congregation or counsel anyone involved in a problem
with his pastor without bringing the pastor in on the
counseling or you can very seriously deepen the problem and
complicate matters more than they are.
Now let us consider some of the ordination of ministers, the
method of ordination and what it means. I do understand it to
have some definite, important meaning beyond a mere
recognition of the call of God upon them. In Acts 13:2-3 we
read, "As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy
Ghost said, Separate me Barnabus and Saul for the work
whereunto I have called them. And when they had fasted and
prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away."
This was a sacred, solemn charge to them and they fasted and
prayed before they did it, even after the Holy Ghost had
spoken to them. They wanted to be certain they were not
mistaken. Ah, brethren, could we be a little admonished at
this point and consider our ordination services as a more
serious and solemn responsibility than we sometimes do. I feel
deeply that I myself can.
I am sure that a token of recognition is a big support from
the ministers with whom and among whom he is going to be
working, but I feel the ordination service goes deeper than
that and the laying on of hands by Holy Spirit filled men
actually imports something to the one on whom their hands are
laid. In I Timothy 4:14 we read, "Neglect not the gift that is
in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on
of the hands of the presbytery." Again in II Timothy 1:6 Paul
said, "Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up
the gift of God, which is in thee by the putting on of my
hands." Paul confirms in these two texts that there was
actually something imparted to them by the laying on of hands
by Holy Spirit filled men. I feel we should teach this to our
people and especially to the candidates for ordination and
prepare them to expect to receive something special from God
when the hands of Holy Ghost filled ministers are laid on
them. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Elders in the Church
Question: Who are the elders in the Church? When are
they elders? Does ordination have anything to do with being an
elder? What is a bishop and what is a deacon? If a minister
has a rebellious child, does that take away his gift?
Answer: We have several questions in one here, but they
are all related, so maybe we can discuss them all together.
It seems apparent from the Scriptures that the term "Elder"
and the term "Bishop" are used interchangeably and apply to
the same officer in the Church. We are not to confuse the
present use of the term "Bishop" with what it was in the early
Church of the Apostolic period. F. G. Smith in his book The
Revelation Explained, on page 94, quotes from the historian
Waddington who says, "...and it is even certain that the terms
'Bishop,' 'Elder' and 'Presbyter' were, in the first
instances, and for a short period, sometimes used
synonymously, and indiscriminately applied to the same order
in the ministry." On page 95 of the same book he quotes from
the historian Milman who says, "The earliest Christian
communities appear to have been ruled and represented, in the
absence of the apostle who was their first founder, by their
elders, who are likewise called bishops, or overseers of the
church." Further he quotes from D'Aubigne's History of the
Reformation on page 96, "The church was in the beginning a
community of brethren, guided by a few of the brethren." And
again, "All Christians were priests of the living God, with
humble pastors as their guides."
It will be noted in all these quotations from these historians
that they are going back to the beginning and describing how
it was then. That is what we must do to get a proper
understanding of these officers in the Church and their
functions. We can certainly be sure that when the Church was
brand-new and fresh from the hand of God that it would be
perfect and exactly like He wanted it. As it was then, so must
it be now. We must go back to the beginning of the New
Testament Church for our pattern and not allow our vision to
be clouded by all the paraphernalia that has been attached to
these terms by ambitious and aspiring men down through the
apostasy and the Dark Ages and their present day usage which
has come on down to us from that time.
The Holy Scriptures also attest to this. In Titus 1:5 we read
Paul's instruction to Titus, "...set in order the things that
are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had
appointed thee." Then verse seven says, "For a bishop must be
blameless, etc." It is clear here that the terms "Elder" and
"Bishop" are used interchangeably.
We find in Titus 1:6 that the qualifications for an "Elder"
(Bishop) is that he must have faithful children not accused of
riot or unruly, and in I Timothy 3:4 we read, "One that ruleth
well his own house, having his children in subjection with all
gravity." But these are conditions that change. Sometimes
unruly children through the prayers of their parents and the
saints, settle down and behave better. Sometimes they become
more rebellious and leave home. In different ways these
conditions may change. Also, they have been known to get
saved, shape up and do well. So, let us not give up on them,
but pray for them and be all the help to them and their
parents that we can. Perchance God may undertake in the matter
and solve the problem in the best way and to the best interest
of all parties involved.
I would hesitate to say that a minister having a rebellious
child would cause his gift to be taken away. However, if
conditions became bad enough it would perhaps shut him down in
the exercise of his gift for the time being until conditions
changed to clear him for going ahead in his calling.
In Acts 20:17 we read concerning Paul, "And from Miletus he
sent to Ephesus, and called the elders of the church." We see
here that at least some congregations had a plurality of
elders more than just one. Also, in verse 28 of this chapter
we learn something else about the elders the most important
thing. That is that they were divinely appointed and qualified
by the Holy Ghost and that they were the overseers of the
Church of God. Their specified duty in this verse was to
"...feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his
own blood." Also in the next three verses they are warned
about some who would come in among them, and some of their own
number who would break rank, and draw away disciples after
them. These elders are charged with the responsibility of
watching and standing guard over the Church and protecting it
against schisms and divisions, false and erroneous doctrines.
In I Peter 5:1-3, Peter is exhorting the "Elders" (it is
important to note that he also classifies himself as an
"Elder" even though he was an "Apostle") and he exhorts them
to "feed the flock of God" and take "the oversight thereof."
Verse three, "Neither as being lords [not overruling margin]
over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock." Paul
declared in II Corinthians 1:24 that he did not have dominion
over their faith, but was a helper of their joy. Some unwise
and overruling pastors require things of people which are
beyond their faith, light, understanding and experience to
which they have attained, and discourage them and crush their
spirits. Instead, they should teach them in love and sympathy
and set a good example before them of those things to which
they desire them to attain. Again in Hebrews 13:17 we read,
"Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves:
for they watch for your souls, as they that must give an
account,..." Where this text says "Rule over you," the margin
says, "Guide." One of the principal ways that a pastor rules
over his congregation is in teaching them from God's Word in
precept and then showing them how it works by a good example
of what he is teaching. These texts all set forth the work of
an "Elder" and his responsibilities and duties and also his
authority.
It has already been noted that an "Elder" is appointed,
qualified and empowered by the Holy Ghost. But a recognition
of his call and qualifications for this work which is known as
"ordination" is also taught in the Scriptures. This is usually
done by the laying on of hands of other ministers. Paul wrote
to Titus to "...Ordain elders in every city,..." Titus 1:5.
Paul also wrote to Timothy to stir up the gift of God which
was in him by the putting on of his hands. II Timothy 1:6. I
Timothy 4:14 says, "Neglect not the gift that is in thee,
which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the
hands of the presbytery." In Acts 13:2-3 we read, "As they
ministered to the Lord and fasted, the Holy Ghost said,
Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have
called them. And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid
their hands on them, they sent them away." Then verse four
says, "So they, being sent forth by the Holy Ghost,..." All
these texts make it clear that the Holy Ghost is the One who
calls, sends, endows with gifts and qualifies "Elders," and
also that the Holy Ghost Himself wants the other ministers to
recognize what He has done and to signify it by the sign of
laying on of their hands. It is certain that any minister can
feel freer in the exercise of his ministry and work more
effectually when he knows that he has the recognition,
support, backing and approval of the other ministers among
whom he works and of the saints. For one to successfully
fulfill the office of an "Elder" or "Overseer" in a
congregation in all its aspects he should be ordained by the
laying on of hands of other ordained ministers. He may preach
just as well and feed the flock just as well without it, but
when it comes to exercising authority and dealing with
problems which may arise in the congregation, he will be much
more effective and respected in his judgment if he has the
recognition and backing of the ministry and the people he is
dealing with know it. So I would say that one is a
full-fledged "Elder," eligible to fulfill all the aspects of
his office, when he is ordained by the laying on of hands of
the presbytery.
In the early Church there were two classes of officers
"Elders" and "Deacons." The "Elders" were in charge of the
spiritual oversight and operation of the Church, while the
"Deacons" were in charge of the temporal affairs of the Church
and the administration of its charities, etc.
In the first four verses of the sixth chapter of Acts, we have
the introduction of the office of "Deacon" into the Church. In
this case a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews
because their widows were neglected in the administration of
the charities and care of them by the Church was taking place.
In other words, they felt they were being discriminated
against and that partiality was being shown. It is altogether
possible that this was the case, since the Jerusalem Church
was predominantly Jewish and they had not yet learned that all
men were equal in God's sight and that there was neither Jew
nor Greek in the body of Christ. When this murmuring reached
the apostles, they called the whole company together and
instructed them to choose out from among them seven men filled
with the Holy Ghost and wisdom, and they would appoint them
over this business, but they would give themselves continually
to prayer, and to the ministry of the Word. That was their job
and they did not have time to attend to the administration of
temporal matters. Verse six says that when these men were
chosen and brought to the apostles they prayed and laid their
hands on them. These men were ordained to administer in the
office of a "Deacon" in that Jerusalem Church.
In the third chapter of I Timothy we have set forth the
qualifications of a "Bishop" or "Elder" in the first seven
verses. Then verses 8-13 set forth the qualifications of a
"Deacon." You will notice there are some strict requirements
on the "Deacon" as well as on the "Elder," and some of them
are the same. God is very particular about any person who
administers in any office in His Church. The deacons were
required to be filled with the Holy Ghost the same as the
elder was required to be Spirit filled. All who administer any
office in the Church or occupy any position of leadership in
the Church are to be Spirit-filled people. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
| The Office of the Bishop
Question: Does I Timothy 3:1 apply to any minister or
just to bishops only?
Answer: This verse refers specifically to "bishops" and
the following verses give a detailed outline of the
qualifications of the man who is to fill that place. The New
American Standard Version says, "If any man aspires to the
office of overseer." Williams Version says, "...the office of
pastor." King James says, "If any man desire the office of a
bishop." This makes it clear that the "bishop" is the overseer
or pastor in a congregation. The catalog of qualifications
given in this case are strict and are calculated to protect
and establish the bishop's (pastor's) right to speak on any
and all matters even in dealing with members of his
congregation on real close points as a pastor must do at
times. But there may be those, and I am sure there are, whom
God has His hand on and is using in a good way to proclaim His
gospel and edify the church and win souls for Him whom we
might not consider eligible to fill the responsible place of a
"bishop" pastor or overseer of a congregation. It surely would
be clear to all that the pastor has a unique calling and fills
a unique place in and to the church where he pastors and that
his qualifications would be more strict than for a "lay
preacher" or someone else working for God in other capacities.
|
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
|
| |
Bearing the Name 'Bishop'
Question: Is it right for one to be bearing "Bishop" as
a name?
Answer: I presume the questioner in this case has
reference to "Bishop" as a title in connection with one's name
such as, "Bishop John Doe." First of all I would point out to
all of us that we should never identify the scriptural term
"Bishop" in the New Testament with the term as used in modern
Christendom with all its attached pomp and preeminence. They
are far different in their usage and meaning. It would
certainly be wrong for an humble saint minister to attach that
title to his name in its modern usage and meaning.
However, the term "Bishop" is a scriptural term found
different times in the New Testament and in connection with
"Overseer," "Oversight," and "Elder" all of which derive from
the same root word. These words occur a number of times in the
New Testament, and refer to the same office. "Bishop" does
refer to an office in the Church and not to any particular
individual. In I Timothy 3:1, Paul says, "...If a man desire
the OFFICE of a bishop, he desireth a good work." I do not
recall any of our brother ministers attaching the term
"Bishop" to their name so I am not used to it and it would
probably cause me a little shock and a little raising of my
eyebrows and wrinkling of my forehead to see it. However,
several of our brethren have attached the term "Elder" to
their names which is the same thing.
In Titus 1:5, Paul says, "For this cause left I thee,...that
thou shouldest...ordain ELDERS in every city,..." Then Titus
1:7 says, "For a BISHOP must be blameless, as the steward of
God;..." It is evident here that "Elder" in verse 5 and
"Bishop" in verse 7 are used interchangeably and refer to the
same office. We also see here that a "Bishop" was the
"Steward" of God. In I Corinthians 4:1, Paul declares himself
to be a minister of Christ and "Steward" of the mysteries of
God. Then Paul was a "Bishop" though he never attached that
term as such to his name. Paul continues in I Corinthians 4:2,
"Moreover it is required in STEWARDS, that a man be found
faithful." In I Timothy 1:12 he said again, "And I thank
Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that he
counted me FAITHFUL, putting me into the ministry." Again in
Luke 12:42 we read, "And the Lord said, Who then is that
FAITHFUL and wise STEWARD, whom his lord shall make ruler over
his household, to give them their portion of meat in due
season?" This verse is important because it makes it clear
what the duties of a "Steward" ("Bishop") are to give the
household of God their portion of meat in due season. Or as
Peter puts it in I Peter 5:2, "Feed the flock of God which is
among you, taking the oversight [or "Bishopric"] thereof,..."
He continues in verse 3, "Neither as being lords over God's
heritage, but being ensamples to the flock."
Oh, how different this is from the modern ecclesiastical
"Bishop" in his pomp, preeminence and position of "LORD" over
God's heritage. In Luke 12:43 Jesus said further concerning
the "FAITHFUL" and good "Steward" (Bishop), "Blessed is that
servant, whom his Lord when he cometh shall find so doing."
Paul said in Titus 1:7 that a "Bishop" was the "Steward" of
God and in Luke 12:42-43 the term "Steward" (Bishop) is used.
These terms are used interchangeably which makes it clear that
a scriptural Bishop is a servant not a lord.
I will say again in closing that I have never known of any of
the brethren attaching the term "Bishop" to their name or
signature. Neither do I recall any place in the New Testament
of any of those brethren using it either such as Bishop Paul,
Bishop Peter, Bishop Timothy, etc. though all of these were
Bishops. We have one case where Peter referred to himself as
an "Elder" (I Peter 5:1) and "Bishop" and "Elder" were
interchangeable terms in the New Testament usage and referred
to the same office (Titus 1:5 and 7). However, I think that
perhaps Peter referred to himself as an "Elder" here not so
much to emphasize his eldership as to equate himself with the
other elders. His statement here is, "The elders which are
among you I exhort, who am also an elder,..." He was placing
himself right among them and not above them.
Some of the brethren have used the term "Elder" and some
"Pastor" attached to their name and signature. I think the
most of them just sign their name without any other
identifying term attached at all. I don't know that we could
have any scriptural quarrel with anyone who used any of these
terms Bishop, Elder, or Pastor in their signature because they
are all scriptural terms and identify the office and position
of the individual. Perhaps the reason our brethren have not
used the term "Bishop" is because of the pomp, honor, and
position it signifies in the modern religious world today
which is entirely foreign and strange to the humble, lowly
servants of the Church to whom it was applied in the New
Testament. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Neither as Being Lords Over God's
Heritage
Question: Please explain I Peter 5:1-3; especially
verse 3 which says, "Neither as being lords over God's
heritage, but being ensamples to the flock." How could a
pastor or minister be a lord over God's heritage?
Answer: I Peter 5:1-3 reads: "The elders which are
among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the
sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that
shall be revealed: Feed the flock of God which is among you,
taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but
willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither
as being lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the
flock."
The reference here to "elders" refers to the office in the
church (pastor, bishop, presbyter, overseer). The first thing
I wish to notice is how different this actually is from the
claim of the Catholic church that Peter was the first bishop
or pope (official head of the church). He presents himself
here as just an elder among other elders, and makes no
ambiguous claim to any special position among them at all. His
only claim of distinction is that he was a witness of the
sufferings of Christ, and a partaker of the glory that shall
be revealed. This was the requirement for apostleship (Acts
1:21-22), and Peter was one of the twelve apostles. Perhaps
the other elders he addressed here were not, which gave him a
degree of distinction among them. But it still remains that he
presented himself as an elder among elders and made no
reference to his being an apostle. There was an humble quality
among those first ministers of the Christian church. Jesus
taught His disciples this. In Matthew 20:25-27 we read: "But
Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes
of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are
great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so
among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be
your minister; And whosoever will be chief among you, let him
be your servant." Then in verse 28 He presents Himself as the
pattern, example, or model and said, "Even as the Son of man
came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give
his life a ransom for many." The idea of promoting one
minister above others and attaching clerical and
ecclesiastical titles to his name was reserved for the
apostate church in a later time as it slipped into apostasy on
its way into the dark ages and the establishment of the "man
of sin" (II Thessalonians 2:3-4) as the universal head of the
church. Exalting of ministers above other ministers was the
path that led to this. Paul referred to it as "the mystery of
iniquity" in II Thessalonians 2:7. John referred to one,
Diotrephes, who loved to have preeminence in the church (III
John 9), and denounced him for this.
In I Peter 5:2, Peter gives this charge to these elders: "Feed
the flock of God which is among you,..." It is the duty of all
pastors to feed the souls of his congregation on the pure,
unadulterated Word of God. In John 21:15-17, Jesus charged
Peter three times to feed His sheep and His lambs. In Acts
20:28, Paul charged the elders of Ephesus, "Take heed
therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the
which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the
church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood."
Therefore, it is clearly the pastor's duty and responsibility
to feed the souls of his congregation.
Continuing on in verse 2, Peter states that the pastor or
elder is to accept his office and responsibility of the
congregation not by constraint (coercion or pressure), but
willingly (God loves willing service). They are not to have
money as a prime objective but are to serve with a ready mind.
Paul also gives this as a required qualification for a bishop
(I Timothy 3:3) or elder (Titus 1:7). ("Bishop" and "elder"
are interchangeable and the same scripturally). In these two
texts Paul says they are not to be given to or greedy of
filthy lucre (money).
Then verse 3 says, "Neither as being lords over God's heritage
[the margin here says "overruling"], but being ensamples to
the flock." The pastor is not to be a tyrant, despot or
overlord, but is to be a shepherd, feeder, and helper of his
flock. Paul says in II Corinthians 1:24, "Not for that we have
dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy: for by
faith ye stand." We see that we are not to domineer over them
or dominate their lives and faith but are to faithfully teach
them the standards of God's Word. We are to help them by every
means available to us to grow and mature in their faith and
experience; but in the meantime, while they are coming to the
full standard, not be chastising them all the time for not
being up to it.
The true pastor will teach his congregation the principles of
truth in the New Testament. Then he will say to them, "This
now is the instruction and this is how you do it. Just watch
me now and see how it works." He is to be the example for
them. Paul said in Philippians 3:17, "Brethren, be followers
together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for
an ensample." Again in Galatians 1:15-16, Paul said, "But when
it pleased God, who...called me by his grace, To reveal his
Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen;..." What
a great truth is expressed here! Paul realized that he was not
qualified to preach Christ until he could reveal Christ.
Neither is anyone else. Again in Philippians 4:9, Paul says,
"Those things, which ye have both learned, and received, and
heard, and seen in me, do: and the God of peace shall be with
you." Note: They had seen in him what they had heard from him.
If a minister preaches a standard that he cannot produce a
good example of but, at the same time, chastises his
congregation if they are short of it, is an example of one of
the ways in which he overrules or exercises lordship over
them.
Read Ezekiel 34:1-10, and get a good, clear, concise picture
of an unfaithful minister (pastor) who is a lord over God's
heritage. Verse 3 says the shepherds eat the fat and clothe
themselves with wool but feed not the flock. Verse 8 says they
feed themselves but feed not the flock. Verse 4 says they have
not strengthened the diseased, healed the sick, bound up the
broken, brought back those who were driven away, sought the
lost; but they have ruled with force and cruelty. What a sad
state for a congregation who has a pastor who does not take
care of their needs and is always demanding more of them but
actually doing less for them.
How different this is from the true, humble pastors whom the
Holy Ghost appoints as overseers of congregations. They rule
over them by guiding them (Hebrews 13:17) and showing them how
the gospel works out in their own lives. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
| Shepherds in Ezekiel 34
Question: Please comment on Ezekiel 34:2-6 (Who are
these shepherds?); also taking into consideration verse 12
"The cloudy and dark day."
Answer: The shepherds spoken of in these verses would
be those whom God had appointed to guide, care for, and feed
His flock, the children of Israel. This would refer to their
priests and prophets. Also in this case, since Israel's
government was a combination of church and state, it might
include their kings and rulers as well. These were all set
over the children of Israel to seek their welfare and best
interest and to guide them in both sacred and secular things.
We get a good view of the Good Shepherd in the 23rd Psalm. We
see the Good Shepherd here providing all the wants of His
sheep, leading them to the still waters and providing for them
security and sufficiency so that they lie down in peace in
green pastures. He never forsakes His flock but is with them
in trouble and adversity the same as in prosperity which is
evidenced by His walking with them through the valley of the
shadow of death. He always provides abundance for them even to
the overflowing stage and sets them a table right in the
presence of their enemies.
In John 10:11, Jesus declares Himself to be the Good Shepherd
and declares that the Good Shepherd giveth His life for the
sheep. Then in verse 12 He speaks of the hireling, whose own
the sheep are not, and when he sees the wolf coming he leaves
the sheep and fleeth; the wolf catches the sheep and scatters
them. Jesus further explained in verse 13 that the reason the
hireling flees when danger and trouble threatens is because he
is just a hireling and is primarily interested in his hire and
temporal gain and does not care for the sheep.
Again in Luke 15:3-7, Jesus presents another graphic picture
of a Good Shepherd looking after his sheep. He has a hundred
sheep and one wanders away and gets lost. He leaves the
ninety-nine in the fold and goes in search of the lost one
until he finds it; then he puts it on his shoulder and carries
it home. He cares for all his sheep and when one is in
trouble, that is the one he seeks to help.
These shepherds spoken of in Ezekiel 34:2-6, were supposed to
be like this and like the Good Shepherd of John 10:11, and the
Shepherd featured in the twenty-third Psalm. But, oh, how
different they were! They were like the hireling Jesus
mentioned in John 10:12-13, and were looking after their own
comforts and gain. They were entirely insensitive to the needs
of the flock. They did not strengthen the diseased, heal the
sick, bind up the broken, bring back those who were driven
away, nor seek that which was lost. They ruled with force and
cruelty. They were totally unfaithful and entirely insensitive
to their responsibility as shepherds of a flock. As a result,
the sheep were scattered and wandered through all the
mountains and high hills of the whole earth and became meat to
be devoured by the beasts of the field. This all actually
happened to the children of Israel again and again because of
their wickedness and idolatry which was instigated by their
priests, prophets, and rulers. It is also a type of what has
happened to the people of God (spiritual Israel) during this
gospel dispensation and has a second fulfillment there.
In Isaiah 9:16, we read, "For the leaders of this people cause
them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed."
Again we read in Isaiah 3:12, "...O my people, they which lead
thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." In
Jeremiah 23, beginning with verse 9 is a strong indictment
against the prophets and priests of Israel. Verse 11 says,
"For both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in my house
have I found their wickedness, saith the Lord." We also read
in verse 13, "And I have seen folly in the prophets of
Samaria; they prophesied in Baal, and caused my people Israel
to err." Clear on down through verse 32 God is strongly
proclaiming against the prophets who prophesy in His name
declaring that "the Lord hath said," but they prophesy lies
and falsehoods.
The awful consequences of all this false prophesying and the
profanity among priests and prophets are found in Jeremiah
14:13-16, which I will insert here. "Then said I, Ah, Lord
God! behold, the prophets say unto them, Ye shall not see the
sword, neither shall ye have famine; but I will give you
assured peace in this place. Then the Lord said unto me, The
prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent them not, neither
have I commanded them, neither spake unto them: they prophesy
unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of naught,
and the deceit of their heart. Therefore thus saith the Lord
concerning the prophets that prophesy in my name, and I sent
them not, yet they say, Sword and famine shall not be in this
land; By sword and famine shall those prophets be consumed.
And the people to whom they prophesy shall be cast out in the
streets of Jerusalem because of the famine and the sword;..."
It becomes apparent here that the people who listen to the
prophets who prophesy falsehoods and offer security in those
falsehoods and doctrines that are not according to God's Word,
shall become victims of those prophets (be devoured by the
beasts of the field the false prophets) and share the same
fate with them.
In Hosea 5:10 it says, "The princes of Judah were like them
that remove the bound: therefore I will pour out my wrath upon
them like water." A few other texts regarding landmarks and
bounds will add a little emphasis to this text where it says
"The princes of Judah were like them that remove the bound."
When the Israelites entered into Canaan land, everyone
received an inheritance consisting of a piece of land secured
by bounds and landmarks. This was to remain in that family
throughout their generation. This inheritance was considered
such a valuable and sacred thing that the daughters of one
tribe were forbidden to marry into another tribe because it
would affect their inheritance which was not transferable to
any other tribe. In Deuteronomy 27:17 a curse was pronounced
upon anyone who tampered with the landmark and altered the
bounds of his neighbor's field. Also read Proverbs 22:28 and
Deuteronomy 19:14. We see this was a very strong charge
against the princes of Judah who were like them that removed
the bound. The princes of Judah would be their prophets,
priests, and rulers. They had tampered with God's Word and
law, and prophesied falsely to the people and led them into
error and idolatry, and God's wrath was against them.
This whole discussion describes the class and condition of the
shepherds in Ezekiel 34, and the awful consequences of their
lordship over the people. It will be necessary to wait until
another time to consider the other part of the question, "the
cloudy and dark day." |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Backslidden Ministers
Question: Please explain Romans 11:29. Does this mean
that if God calls a person into the ministry or for any other
phase of the work of God and endows him with gifts suitable to
his call; if that person backslides his gifts and calling
still continue on even after he has backslidden?
Answer: The answer to this question is a resounding
"NO." The text in the question has no reference at all to
Divine calls and gifts of the Spirit in the operation of the
New Testament Church. But this text refers to God's purposes
and plans concerning Israel and the covenant and promises made
with their fathers. The full text reads: "For the gifts and
calling of God are without repentance." Verse 28 says of the
Jews that "...they are beloved for the fathers' sakes." "The
fathers" in this text refers to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. To
these men God gave a covenant incorporating some broad,
sweeping promises; first to Abraham and then confirming them
with Isaac and Jacob, heirs together with him of the same
promises.
The covenant and promise made to these men have a far-reaching
importance, so let us look at them a little. In Genesis 12:1,
we have the call of Abraham to separate himself from his
father's house and his kindred and go to a land that He would
show him. In Genesis 12:2 He promised to make of him a great
nation and bless him and make him a blessing and to make his
name great. Then Genesis 12:3 is the all-important promise,
"...In thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." This
is very far-reaching. In Genesis 18:18 is another reference to
this same promise but this text uses the term "all nations"
instead of "all families" as in Genesis 12:3. In Genesis 17:19
God said to Abraham that his wife, Sarah, would bear him a son
and he should call his name "Isaac." He further said He would
establish His covenant with him and with his seed after and it
would be an everlasting covenant. And in Genesis 21:12 God
told Abraham that "...In Isaac shall thy seed be called." And
again in Genesis 22:18 God said to Abraham "And in thy seed
shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou
hast obeyed my voice."
Now it must be evident from these statements that it was God's
original plan and purpose to bless and provide the blessing of
salvation to the whole world (Gentiles all nations the same as
the Jews) and this was to be brought about through Abraham's
seed. Now a reference to Galatians 3:16 will throw a bright
light on all of this. "Now to Abraham and his seed were the
promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as
of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ."
It must be clear, then, that the ultimate end of the covenant
with Abraham and all its promises transcended centuries and
ages and cut right straight through to Jesus Christ and
terminated in Him.
So let us back up a little now to the call of Abraham to leave
his father's house and be separated from his kindred (Genesis
12:1). There was a distinct reason for this. The people where
Abraham grew up, including Abraham's father and his household,
were all idolaters. It may be assumed that Abraham himself
worshiped idol gods and served them, too. We read in Joshua
24:2 "...Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in
old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham,...and they served
other gods." Verse 3 continues and says "And I took your
father Abraham from the other side of the flood,..." We see
here that God was not pleased to establish His covenant of
salvation and grace with a people serving and worshipping idol
gods. So He separated Abraham from them and revealed Himself
to him until he knew and recognized Him as the true and living
God and accepted Him as his God. Because he obeyed His voice
and went out from his people as he was instructed to do and
forsook his idol gods, God established His covenant with him
and made him the head and beginning of a new race separated
from all others. This was the Israelites and speaking of them
in I Kings 8:53 Solomon said, "For thou didst separate them
from among all the people of the earth, to be thine
inheritance,..." Again in Deuteronomy 26:18 we read, "And the
Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people, as
he hath promised thee and that thou shouldest keep all his
commandments." And finally in II Samuel 7:24 we read, "For
thou hast confirmed to thyself thy people Israel to be a
people unto thee for ever: and thou, Lord, art become their
God."
It was through this line, this separated, distinctive, holy,
peculiar, separated unto the Lord line, that the Messiah was
to come; the SEED of Abraham in whom all the nations of the
world were to be blessed. God chose and separated Israel unto
Himself for this particular, specific purpose. Several times
Israel was in severe crisis and threatened with extinction,
but God most miraculously and in most unexpected ways
intervened and preserved and sustained them until time for
Christ to be born and presented to the world. God's Word said
in Genesis 49:10, "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah,
nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and
unto him shall the gathering of the people be." Even though
they were a conquered and subjected people under the Romans
when Christ was born, yet their political system and religious
system were still pretty much intact and they were permitted a
measure of freedom to operate their system among themselves.
To this extent Genesis 49:10 was fulfilled and God had
succeeded in bringing this line through intact and
accomplishing His purpose for getting His Son into the world.
Soon after the life and ministry of Christ (70 A.D.) the
Jewish nation with their capitol city, Jerusalem, and the
Jewish polity was totally and most miserably destroyed but not
until He had carried out His plan and accomplished His purpose
through them. But in all of this there was no repenting,
withdrawing, or changing of plan or purpose on God's part. He
accomplished what He had in mind to accomplish in them.
Neither was there any breaking of any of God's promises to
them in forsaking them and permitting them to be so miserably
destroyed without His aid. True, God had promised to be with
them and not forsake them. In Hebrews 13:5 a reference is made
to this promise "...I will never leave thee, nor forsake
thee." But right along with that promise He also said, "If you
forsake me, I will forsake you." (II Chronicles 15:2, 24:20;
Deuteronomy 31:16-17.) When the Jews filled up their cup of
iniquity in rejecting God's Son and crucifying Him and had
utterly forsaken God; then He abandoned and forsook them as a
people and let them miserably perish. But He had faithfully
warned them of this several times and was thoroughly justified
in abandoning them. They ceased to be a special people unto
God at that time and will never be such again. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
| Ministers, Doctors, Hospitals,
and Medicine Question: What should be the
position of the Church of God and saints in general in regard
to ministers and gospel workers who willingly submit
themselves into the hands of doctors and go to hospitals or
resort to medicines? Would it be thought conceivable that God
would instruct such an one to submit to doctors, etc.?
Answer: Divine healing has been a fundamental, cardinal
doctrine of the Church of God from its inception on the Day of
Pentecost and throughout this dispensation of time down to
now. In Act. 5:12 we read of many signs and wonders being
wrought among the people by the hands of the apostles. Verse
15 tells of them bringing forth the sick and laying them on
beds and couches in the street in order that the shadow of
Peter might pass over them that they might be healed. Verse 16
tells of many people from the cities roundabout bringing their
sick folks into Jerusalem, and they were every one healed. The
Church started out this way, and everywhere the gospel of the
kingdom has been preached, both then and all along through the
ages of time until now, it has been accompanied by healing of
the sick. The preaching of the gospel and divine healing have
always gone hand in hand they are actually components one of
another.
The doctrine of divine healing was taught and practiced by all
the early ministers of this Evening Light Reformation, and is
still taught and practiced by the true ministers of God today.
My parents were both among the early pioneer ministers of the
Evening Light Reformation, and I had first hand knowledge from
them as to how this doctrine was taught and practiced among
them. They taught that saints should trust God with their
bodies as well as their souls, and it was God's will and plan
to heal His people without the aid of doctors and medicines in
answer to the prayer of faith. This has been the code that
true saints of God have lived by throughout this age of time.
God has set His seal to it, and has healed every kind of
sickness and disease in the books, and has confirmed the
preaching of this doctrine with signs following.
It has always been considered substandard for saints in light
to resort to medical remedies and treatment, and still is.
There are too many among us today going to hospitals and dying
there in the hands of the doctors. This is not according to
God's Word. Because of this, we are being robbed of victories
and the manifestation of God's power and glory in our midst.
But when ministers do these things, what shall we say? What
can we say in behalf of those who have persevered in their
faith, died in the faith, and refused to accept deliverance
from pain, sickness, and death by human aid in order to please
God and hold their integrity with Him? Consider the young
saints who have laid their lives on the line to trust God and
be faithful to Him in times of severe and potentially fatal
sickness young mothers and fathers trusting God with their
families as well as their own lives, and have persevered and
gone down to the bars of death trusting in the Lord. Then God
came and healed them, raised them up, and now they sit in the
service listening to someone preach who has been in the
hospital and maybe had an operation, etc. What shall we say;
what can we say to people like that in such a case? Folks, it
cannot be that we would ever represent folks as being in good
standing who do these things and lower the standard of truth
in this way until they have properly cleared themselves.
F. G. Smith, in his book What the Bible Teaches, on page 197
(chapter ten, "Divine Healing"), says, "This blessed truth is
established in the Word of God." Then he continues, "This
doctrine has been ignored by many; but 'what if some did not
believe? Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without
effect?' (Romans 3:3.) It is not what men believe or do not
believe that is to settle the great facts of truth, but it is
what the Word of God says."
The healing which was to characterize the life of Jesus Christ
was prophesied in Isaiah 35:3-6, Isaiah 53:4-5, and in many
other Old Testament scriptures. These prophecies of Isaiah
were declared to be fulfilled in the ministry of Jesus in
Matthew 8:16-17 where it says, "When the even was come, they
brought unto him many that were possessed with devils: and he
cast out the spirits with his word, and healed all that were
sick: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias
the prophet, saying, Himself took our infirmities, and bare
our sicknesses." And we also read in Matthew 4:24, "And his
(Jesus') fame went throughout all Syria: and they brought unto
him all sick people that were taken with divers diseases and
torments, and those which were possessed with devils, and
those which were lunatick, and those that had the palsy: and
he healed them."
Jesus also delegated this power and authority to cast out
devils, heal the sick, and preach the kingdom of God when He
sent forth His twelve disciples (Matthew 10:1; Mark 6:12-13).
He also delegated this same power and authority to seventy
others when He sent them forth in Luke 10:1-9. In fact, Jesus
delegated to the Church, His body, and especially its
ministry, this power and authority to heal the sick and cast
out devils, as well as other miraculous things. This was a
permanent arrangement throughout this gospel age of time. The
commission as given in Mark 16:15-18, states this: "And he
said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the
gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized
shall be saved;... And these signs shall follow them that
believe;... they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall
recover." Do we believe that the part of Jesus' commission
which says, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved"
is still in effect today? Surely, we do. But what foundation
do we have for believing this and not believe also that part
of the same commission which says that they who believe "shall
lay hands on the sick and they shall recover" is also in
effect today? Surely, the commission that Jesus gave shall
stand in its entirety in all of its parts until the end of the
world. Hebrews 13:8 says, "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, to
day, and for ever."
In James 5:14-15, we read these instructions to the Church
after it was set up and operating: "Is any sick among you? let
him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over
him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: And the
prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise
him up;..."
Yes, the doctrine of divine healing is well founded in the
Holy Scriptures throughout. This is what God's ministers are
to preach and teach to the people. But if we are going to
preach it, we must also practice it and demonstrate its work
ability. The Word of God says, "The husbandman that laboreth
must be first partaker of the fruits." II Timothy 2:6. The
ministers are to be ensamples to the flock (I Peter 5:3);
teach them what to do and then show them how to do it.
This doctrine taught so general and generously throughout the
New Testament is being grossly corrupted in our day. We have a
parallel of this in the corrupting of the gospel in regard to
salvation in the New Testament. Paul was preaching the pure
gospel of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ only without
any human works attached to it. The Judaizers in Paul's day
accepted Christ as the Messiah, but they connected to that
circumcision and the works of the law, without which they said
people could not be saved. This was a corruption of the pure
gospel of salvation which Paul was preaching, and it was in
this area that he had his greatest conflicts. In II
Corinthians 2:17 Paul declared himself to be not of the number
which corrupted the Word of God.
We have the same principle at work here in our day in
corrupting the Word of God with regard to the doctrine of
healing. It is held that God gave us physicians and gave them
skill, knowledge, and understanding of the human body to be
able to help us in our sicknesses. Oh, of course, we say, they
have their limits, but they do what they can do and then God
does the actual healing. Is this not the same corrupting
principle that Paul encountered in his day regarding
salvation? But I say, if God has to do the real healing in the
final analysis of the case, why not let Him do it all in the
first place and not get any human works mixed in with it? Let
God get all the glory and we get all the inspiration and
blessing that comes with this work of God upon us. This is
God's plan and purpose for bringing about a closer
relationship between His children and Himself. |
|
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gifts and Calling of God are Without
Repentance
Question: Please explain Romans 11:29. Does this mean that if
God calls a person into the ministry or for any other phase of the
work of God and endows him with gifts suitable to his call; if that
person backslides his gifts and calling still continue on even after
he has backslidden?
Answer: The answer to this question is a resounding "NO." The
text in the question has no reference at all to Divine calls and
gifts of the Spirit in the operation of the New Testament Church.
But this text refers to God's purposes and plans concerning Israel
and the covenant and promises made with their fathers. The full text
reads: "For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance."
Verse 28 says of the Jews that "...they are beloved for the fathers'
sakes." "The fathers" in this text refers to Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob. To these men God gave a covenant incorporating some broad,
sweeping promises; first to Abraham and then confirming them with
Isaac and Jacob, heirs together with him of the same promises.
The covenant and promise made to these men have a far-reaching
importance, so let us look at them a little. In Genesis 12:1, we
have the call of Abraham to separate himself from his father's house
and his kindred and go to a land that He would show him. In Genesis
12:2 He promised to make of him a great nation and bless him and
make him a blessing and to make his name great. Then Genesis 12:3 is
the all-important promise, "...In thee shall all families of the
earth be blessed." This is very far-reaching. In Genesis 18:18 is
another reference to this same promise but this text uses the term
"all nations" instead of "all families" as in Genesis 12:3. In
Genesis 17:19 God said to Abraham that his wife, Sarah, would bear
him a son and he should call his name "Isaac." He further said He
would establish His covenant with him and with his seed after and it
would be an everlasting covenant. And in Genesis 21:12 God told
Abraham that "...In Isaac shall thy seed be called." And again in
Genesis 22:18 God said to Abraham "And in thy seed shall all the
nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice."
Now it must be evident from these statements that it was God's
original plan and purpose to bless and provide the blessing of
salvation to the whole world (Gentiles all nations the same as the
Jews) and this was to be brought about through Abraham's seed. Now a
reference to Galatians 3:16 will throw a bright light on all of
this. "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith
not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which
is Christ."
It must be clear, then, that the ultimate end of the covenant with
Abraham and all its promises transcended centuries and ages and cut
right straight through to Jesus Christ and terminated in Him.
So let us back up a little now to the call of Abraham to leave his
father's house and be separated from his kindred (Genesis 12:1).
There was a distinct reason for this. The people where Abraham grew
up, including Abraham's father and his household, were all
idolaters. It may be assumed that Abraham himself worshiped idol
gods and served them, too. We read in Joshua 24:2 "...Your fathers
dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the
father of Abraham,...and they served other gods." Verse 3 continues
and says "And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the
flood,..." We see here that God was not pleased to establish His
covenant of salvation and grace with a people serving and
worshipping idol gods. So He separated Abraham from them and
revealed Himself to him until he knew and recognized Him as the true
and living God and accepted Him as his God. Because he obeyed His
voice and went out from his people as he was instructed to do and
forsook his idol gods, God established His covenant with him and
made him the head and beginning of a new race separated from all
others. This was the Israelites and speaking of them in I Kings 8:53
Solomon said, "For thou didst separate them from among all the
people of the earth, to be thine inheritance,..." Again in
Deuteronomy 26:18 we read, "And the Lord hath avouched thee this day
to be his peculiar people, as he hath promised thee and that thou
shouldest keep all his commandments." And finally in II Samuel 7:24
we read, "For thou hast confirmed to thyself thy people Israel to be
a people unto thee for ever: and thou, Lord, art become their God."
It was through this line, this separated, distinctive, holy,
peculiar, separated unto the Lord line, that the Messiah was to
come; the SEED of Abraham in whom all the nations of the world were
to be blessed. God chose and separated Israel unto Himself for this
particular, specific purpose. Several times Israel was in severe
crisis and threatened with extinction, but God most miraculously and
in most unexpected ways intervened and preserved and sustained them
until time for Christ to be born and presented to the world. God's
Word said in Genesis 49:10, "The sceptre shall not depart from
Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and
unto him shall the gathering of the people be." Even though they
were a conquered and subjected people under the Romans when Christ
was born, yet their political system and religious system were still
pretty much intact and they were permitted a measure of freedom to
operate their system among themselves. To this extent Genesis 49:10
was fulfilled and God had succeeded in bringing this line through
intact and accomplishing His purpose for getting His Son into the
world.
Soon after the life and ministry of Christ (70 A.D.) the Jewish
nation with their capitol city, Jerusalem, and the Jewish polity was
totally and most miserably destroyed but not until He had carried
out His plan and accomplished His purpose through them. But in all
of this there was no repenting, withdrawing, or changing of plan or
purpose on God's part. He accomplished what He had in mind to
accomplish in them. Neither was there any breaking of any of God's
promises to them in forsaking them and permitting them to be so
miserably destroyed without His aid. True, God had promised to be
with them and not forsake them. In Hebrews 13:5 a reference is made
to this promise "...I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee." But
right along with that promise He also said, "If you forsake me, I
will forsake you." (II Chronicles 15:2, 24:20; Deuteronomy
31:16-17.) When the Jews filled up their cup of iniquity in
rejecting God's Son and crucifying Him and had utterly forsaken God;
then He abandoned and forsook them as a people and let them
miserably perish. But He had faithfully warned them of this several
times and was thoroughly justified in abandoning them. They ceased
to be a special people unto God at that time and will never be such
again. |
|
|
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
|
|
|
The Gift of Miracles/Healing
Question: What is the gift of miracles? Does anyone have it?
Is it not the same as the gift of healing as recorded in I
Corinthians 12:9, 28, 29?
Answer: Miracle in the dictionary is defined as "An
extraordinary event manifesting the supernatural work of God." And,
of course, healing of sicknesses in answer to the prayer of faith
without the aid of doctors and medicines would fall into this
category and be included in this definition. The fact that they are
mentioned separately in the scriptures referred to, seems to me
sufficient evidence that the scriptures separate between healing and
miracles and places them in different categories.
Sickness is defined as a disease, malady, disorder, illness, nausea,
etc. This would include such things as tuberculosis, cancer, fevers
of various kinds, polio, etc. Some sicknesses leave their marks and
effects in the body such as blindness, deafness, deformed and
undeveloped parts, as in the case of polio and various other
weaknesses and disorders. Healing, it seems to me, would involve
curing of the disease itself while it would involve a miracle to
remove the effects of the sickness which remain in the body after
the sickness itself is gone; such as restoring of sight to the
blind, hearing to the deaf and restoring of the deformed and useless
or crippled parts left as a result of polio after the polio is gone.
Miracles also reach out into areas beyond the category of healing,
such as the expulsion of evil spirits (Acts 8:7 and Acts 16:18); the
controlling of the elements such as Jesus calming the storm Mark
4:39; Peter's deliverance from prison Acts 12:5-10; and the release
of the other apostles from prison Acts 5:17-23; feeding the
multitudes with five loaves and two fishes Matthew 14:15-21; and
seven loaves and a few fishes Matthew 15:32-38; raising the dead to
life again Matthew 9:18-26 and Acts 9:36-41; the numerous instances
of restoring sight to the blind, hearing to the deaf, making the
lame to walk and the dumb to speak, etc., and such like: too
numerous to mention.
And even though I may not know or be able to point out specifically
someone who has this gift of miracles, yet I am sure there must be
some who have it, as the church in the earth would be a crippled
church operating without one of its parts without this gift. I urge
that more of us would earnestly seek this gift as well as the others
also. This is a gift of the Spirit given to the church and whoever
will earnestly seek it and qualify for it may have it. |
|
|
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
|