|
(Click on a heading to read
the respective article.) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Standards of God's Word (And the
Economy of Grace) I feel inclined to insert a few
thoughts in this space in discussion of what I consider to be
a topic to saints; the idea of a clear perspective, a deeper
comprehension, and a more thorough understanding of the
standards of God's Word for Christian living and the abundant
supply in the economy of God's grace for attaining to high
standards of holy living.
Gregory Mantle in the introduction of his book Better Things
from Above inserts a quote from Faber which says, "The devil
can fight as successfully against God with low views as with
mortal sins. Low views of the privileges and possibilities of
the Christian life result inevitably in slackness and
weakness."
Low views produce low standards for the life which, in turn,
results in only limited blessings from God and a limited
measure of divine grace which, in turn, robs us of victories
which we might otherwise have and the richness and fulfillment
which should be realized in Christian living. This is true
because we have low views of Christian standards and
consequently settle for a low plane of living with whatever
degree of blessings, joy and grace that affords. Therefore we
do not expect much of ourselves nor demand much of ourselves
in the way of Christian living and do not expect much from God
in the way of divine aid to raise our standards of living and
do better and gain greater victories. Thus we live our lives
on the defensive and always have our defenses out and are
loaded with excuses for our failures when we are overcome in
the trials and tests of life. My answer to those who live this
way is that whatever excuses you have for your failures in
being what God wants you to be and failing of the grace of God
in the test; you better be thinking up some good ones because
you are going to have to meet God with those excuses some day.
The good news I bring you is that you do not have to go
through life this way on short rations because the same God
who wrote the Bible and set up the standards of holy living
outlined in those holy scriptures, set up an economy of grace
to go along with those scriptures to supply every person with
a sufficiency of grace to enable every Christian person to
come up to the full standard of every principle of truth
taught in the New Testament if they will just humble their
hearts and submit to God and go down and get it.
It is appalling and downright pitiful and tragic that many
people get all involved in worldly activities after the
worldly mold and patterns even to the extent they allow those
things to hinder them from their Christian duties and
attending church services, etc., and they still affirm they
are keeping victory and living for God and pray all the time
whether they are in service or not and God is blessing them
right along. What I fear is that some people get all caught up
in these things and carried away with them and get all elated
and feel a strong sense of satisfaction in themselves over
what they are doing and actually honestly mistake this for
spiritual blessings. Folks, I affirm this is not true and
cannot be true in God's setup of things. It is certainly low
views when we think we can mix up our lives between the Lord
and these worldly activities and feel this to be acceptable to
God and that He blesses our lives right on. We can defeat
ourselves; yea, even destroy ourselves with our thinking low
views.
We can see many signs of compromise (low views) among the
people today immodest dress, bodily adornment, jewelry,
worldly fashions, cutting and frilling the hair, worldly
amusements, etc. These things belong to the outward life and
we can see them and all of them are an important part of the
general let down and departing from the "faith once delivered
to the saints." However, there is another type of compromise
which is more subtle and hidden which we do not see on the
outside and therefore it gains its ground and does its fatal
work in the soul without our knowing it until it is done. That
is a type of compromise hidden in the heart involving
attitudes, feelings, bitterness, unforgiveness, resentments,
pet peeves, etc., and God's Word says there are many defiled
with these things. (Hebrews 12:15-16.) For one to have these
things in his life and retain them and cherish them and excuse
them because of circumstances and how he was treated and still
feel himself clear before God and justify himself in them is a
clear, direct compromise of the scriptural codes for holy
living and will render him ineffectual in prayer and dry up
his prayer life and bring him to total defeat in his purpose
to live for God and be saved. We must be healed of our hurts,
wounds, bitterness and critical and bad attitudes if we expect
to prosper in our spiritual lives and get to heaven in the
end. Let us all seek to encompass in the scope of our thinking
and perspectives the possibilities of the healing of our souls
and total victory over all these things through the abundance
of God's grace. Let us not entertain any low views here.
The good news I bring you today is that you do not have to be
a victim of circumstances. You can, through the grace of God,
rise above them. Read Romans 8:35-39. Neither do you have to
live under the cloud of hurt feelings, offences, mistreatment,
spitefulness, misrepresentations, etc., but can rather abide
under the shadow of the Almighty. Psalm 31:20 says, "...thou
shalt keep them secretly in a pavilion from the strife of
tongues." Job 5:21 says, "Thou shalt be hid from the scourge
of the tongue:..." The margin says here "When the tongue
scourgeth."
Some people could stand an actual whip lashing better than a
tongue-lashing. When hard and sharp things are said to them,
it cuts them down and they can never get over it. It is a
peculiar kind of pride that causes people to be so sensitive
to what people say to them. By the grace of God you can be
healed of this sensitiveness and rise above it and overcome
it. Read Matthew 5:43-44 and then settle it that whatever God
tells us to do, He has already provided the grace and strength
to enable us to do it. It begins with humility and denial of
one's self. God resists the proud but gives grace to the
humble. (James 4:6.) Let us never say we can't do this or that
God instructs us to do. Only say we have not been able to do
it yet but we are on our way.
If you are down under or plagued by any of these things, you
don't have to be. You are thus because you have settled for it
that way. You have concluded you are just that way and that is
your natural makeup and you can't help it. However, under God
you can. You can appeal to God and submit yourself to Him and
He can heal you of that defect in your nature and make you
over new ALL NEW. (II Corinthians 5:17.)
One of the things in which the children of Israel displeased
God and brought His judgment down on them was that they
limited the Holy One of Israel. (Psalm 78:41.) Let us
therefore beware lest we fall after the same example of
unbelief. Let us not limit the Holy One of Israel nor discount
what His grace can do for us and just plain quit thinking we
can't rise above these things and every other thing that is
contrary to us and detrimental to our spiritual lives and
would hinder us from fulfilling the Bible standards for holy
living and boldly declare "I can do all things through Christ
which strengtheneth me." Phil 4:13. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Biblical Christian Perfection
Question: Will you please make some discussion on
biblical Christian perfection?
Answer: The term "perfect" and the term "perfection"
are used a number of times in the New Testament and in some
instances mean or refer to different things. The context will
determine its application and meaning. But in no instance does
it refer to human perfection or a human being out beyond human
error in judgment or being complete in knowledge. Peter said
in II Peter 3:18, "But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of
our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ...." This is clearly an
open-ended statement. It suggests no termination. It is not
said here to grow in grace and knowledge until you "know it
all" and there is no more knowledge to be obtained, and until
you have all the grace there is and there is no more grace to
be obtained. The matter of Christian growth and development is
a perpetual, continuous thing from the beginning of our
salvation to the end of our life. If one ceases to grow at any
time along the line, he will become stale and stagnant, and if
persisted in, will lose his contact and relationship with God.
But don't ever try that out to see if it is so or not, for
this is not the will of God concerning you. But it is the will
of God that you be continually advancing into new territory
and areas in your experience and relationship with God, being
always fresh and vibrant, making the way of God attractive to
your associates.
In Matthew 5:48 Jesus said, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as
your Father which is in heaven is perfect." This statement of
Jesus must be taken in context to get the proper meaning of it
and the key word in it is "THEREFORE." This word refers back
to what has been said before. The thought begins back in verse
38 where Jesus begins to teach about our attitudes and
dealings with our fellowmen. He said here that it had been
said back under the law "...An eye for an eye, and a tooth for
a tooth." Now that was the standard under the law but Jesus
taught a different standard than that. "...Grace and truth
came by Jesus Christ." (John 1:17.) He said to resist not evil
but if they smite us on one cheek, turn the other also, if
they sue us at the law and take away our coat, give them our
cloak also, and if they compel us to go a mile, go two. In
other words, see to it that we give full satisfaction to our
adversaries regardless of the injustices involved. Verse 42
says, "Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would
borrow of thee turn not thou away." Again the context must be
strictly observed to get the proper meaning of this text.
Jesus is certainly not teaching here promiscuous giving to
every Tom, Dick and Harry. He is teaching that we should be
willing to help our enemies if they are in need and not turn
them away or discriminate against them because they have
struck us in the face or have treated us unjustly but to
render aid to them if they are in need as though they were our
friends.
Then in verse 43 He referred again to the law standard of
loving our neighbor and hating our enemy. The law permitted
this but Jesus in the standard He taught said in verse 44,
"...Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to
them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use
you, and persecute you." Then in verse 45 He makes known His
own attitude toward all humankind and says, "...He maketh his
sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on
the just and on the unjust." It is in this respect that He
says to us to be perfect even as He is perfect. Let us
recognize that this instruction was given in connection with
the thought of our dealing with and attitude toward all
humankind (both friend and foe) and is accentuated by a
declaration of His own attitude toward them all and this is
the pattern for us to adopt in all of our dealings and
attitudes toward everybody. Let us also realize that the One
who gave us this command and set up this standard is the One
who has all power in heaven and in earth and is abundantly
able to supply us with sufficient grace and power to reach it.
Let us not settle for anything less than this, but just humble
our hearts and earnestly seek God for that measure of grace
which will enable us to live to this standard.
Let it be remembered that though God has mercies and a package
of blessings for all mankind in general, yet He has a special
package of special blessings for His own people who love and
serve Him. This is made clear throughout the Scriptures in
God's special dealings with them. He also teaches us to be
this way. In Galatians 6:10 we read, "As we have therefore
opportunity, let us do good unto all men, ESPECIALLY unto them
who are of the household of faith." We are to make a specialty
of favor to the saints, but never to discriminate against an
adversary who is in need just because he is an adversary.
In Hebrews 10:14 it says, "...He hath perfected for ever them
that are sanctified." In this text "PERFECT" means complete or
finished. Man's salvation has two parts. He is first saved
(forgiven of all sins and trespasses when he properly repents
of them), but that is only part of his salvation. That work of
grace in the soul does not in any way affect that native
depravity or sin nature which came upon us all from Adam.
Repentance could not touch that because we were not
responsible for it; hence, we would have no conviction of it
or a godly sorrow concerning it. It is removed by the Holy
Ghost with the blood of Jesus for our heart's cleansing by the
means of consecration and faith. Salvation is not completed
without this experience. Therefore, receiving this sanctifying
grace makes our salvation complete. Hence it is said we are
perfected (completed or finished as pertains to our
salvation). Perfection here does not mean we have reached the
end of all spiritual growth and advancement in our spiritual
lives. Far from it. We are just then prepared to launch forth
on this venture and will be pursuing it the remainder of our
lives.
In Colossians 1:28 we read, "Whom (Christ) we preach, warning
every man, and teaching every man in all wisdom; that we may
present every man PERFECT in Christ Jesus." Again, "perfect"
here refers to their being complete, entire, finished in their
Christian experience. Paul said again in Ephesians 4:15, "But
speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all
things, which is the head, even Christ." The objective of the
Apostle Paul in all of this preaching and teaching was to
nourish them up in every principle of truth, in all the ways
of truth and righteousness, that he could present all his
converts perfect, complete, entire, a finished product in the
grace of God in Christ. He said in Colossians 2:10, "And ye
are complete in him,..." This is the meaning of the term
"perfect" in this text.
You will note that not one of the texts I have used in this
lesson had any reference to being perfect human beings beyond
making mistakes or erring in judgment. Some people, not having
understood this, have judged and condemned themselves in
regard to some innocent mistakes they made and the enemy has
taken advantage of them to impose upon them a spirit of
accusation. Also, some who have not understood what Christian
perfection is, have broken off fellowship with them when they
should not have. Let us allow ourselves and all other saints
to be human and live their lives freely and not under
critical, prying eyes; and let us have charity and patience
with them in their mistakes considering ourselves to be human
also.
In Hebrews 5:9 we read, "And being made perfect, he became the
author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him." We
see here that Jesus' being made perfect was all-important to
our salvation. But what did this involve and how was it
accomplished? Hebrews 2:10 says, "For it became him, for whom
are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many
sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation
perfect through sufferings." I acknowledge frankly that for
many years I was not able to comprehend the idea of Jesus
being made perfect. The reason was because I always thought of
Jesus as being perfect. Now here comes God's Word talking
about Him being "made perfect" through suffering. Actually, He
was morally and spiritually perfect from time immemorial. Only
after He had personally encountered every temptation and
suffering in His flesh and lived His life on the same plane
that we have to live ours could He be able to lead us to
glory.
Hebrews 5:8 says, "Though he were a Son, yet learned he
obedience by the things which he suffered." I never got the
full import of this, either, until one day this week while
meditating on a message that Bro. Keith Fuller had brought in
our Assembly Meeting on the sufferings of Jesus. There is no
such thing as suffering in heaven where Jesus was until He
left there and came here on a mission of redemption. Then when
He took on Himself the seed of Abraham and was clothed in
human flesh and lived as one of us, He had to learn to take
orders and obey. Philippians 2:8 says that Jesus humbled
Himself and became obedient unto death. Luke 13:23-33 makes it
clear that His death was His perfection. Verse 33 says,
"Nevertheless I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the day
following: for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of
Jerusalem." This is a clear reference to His death at
Jerusalem and "the day following" tomorrow would be the third
day. Verse 32 says that on the third day He would be
perfected. This confirms that His death was His perfection.
Also, Hebrews 2:18 says, "For in that he himself hath suffered
being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted."
Then we have this concerning the perfection of Jesus: Jesus
learned obedience through the things which He suffered
(Hebrews 5:8), and it was through suffering that He was made
perfect. (Hebrews 5:8-9 and Hebrews 2:10.) Therefore, when
Jesus had faithfully obeyed His Father in submitting Himself
unto every kind of suffering and temptation that humankind
could possibly encounter in life and had overcome it all to
the final and even His death; and came out in the end with a
perfect score offering Himself without spot to God, He was
then completely, thoroughly, entirely, and totally qualified
to be a perfect captain of our salvation to lead us to glory.
This is what the term "perfect" means in regard to Christ
being the captain of our salvation; completely, thoroughly,
totally, entirely qualified and able to do this and lead us to
glory. It has no reference to perfecting Him morally,
spiritually, intellectually, or in any of His divine
attributes.
Now I will consider Paul's references to "perfect" in the
third chapter of Philippians. In Philippians 3:12 he says,
"Not as though I had already attained, either were already
perfect:..." Connected to verse 11, this would seem to be a
reference to the resurrection of the dead as attaining and
being made perfect. But I feel certain, by the general tenor
or Paul's writing in all his epistles, that Paul had a clear
vision of greater and greater accomplishments in his spiritual
life and Christian experience and He was striving for and
reaching out for deeper depths, higher heights, longer
lengths, and broader breadths in the things of God. This being
true, he could never reckon himself to be perfect so long as
he could envision greater depths and heights out ahead.
So I am reckoning this reference to "perfect" in verse 12 to
involve this idea even though it might be a direct reference
to his resurrection. However, he said in verse 15, "Let us
therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded:..." Here is
a reference to some who are perfect. I am picking up the
thought here that Christian perfection is a progressive thing.
He declared himself to not be perfect but he also said, "Let
us (you and I) therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus
minded:..." This is equivalent to saying, "I do not claim to
be perfect, but I am perfect." "Ah, come on," you say. "You
are talking in riddles now." Well, so be it; that's just the
way it is. Let me illustrate with a student in school. Take,
for example, a small child in the first grade. He will learn
little one, two, and three-letter words, and 1+1, 2+2, and 3+3
problems, etc. If, at the end of the year, he can spell all
those little words and work all those little problems
correctly, that is perfect for him in the first grade. But it
would not be perfect for a student in college. He is supposed
to know more than that. All the way up from the first grade to
college he can be perfect all the time; year after year, grade
after grade; but never be perfect for the grade ahead of him
at any time. It is this way in the Christian life. A brand-new
convert (a babe in Christ) may have completely satisfied God
and be up-to-date with Him and be perfect in his relationship
with Him, but that would not at all be perfect for the person
who has been saved for ten or fifteen years. He is supposed to
understand more about God and know more truth than that new
convert.
The Christian life is a continual and perpetual growth and
development. In II Peter 3:18, we are admonished to "...grow
in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus
Christ...." We may be perfect before God but to maintain that
state of perfection, we must be walking in the light,
measuring up to the truth, and continually climbing up to
higher and higher levels of divine grace. What is perfect for
you now may not be perfect a year from now, and certainly will
not be if you maintain a normal pace of growth in grace.
Philippians 3:15 says that all who are perfect should be "thus
minded:..." "Thus minded" would refer to something said
before, and actually is a foundation for everything said from
verse 1 clear to the 15th verse. This would include having a
mind to worship God in the spirit and having no confidence in
the flesh (verse 3); counting the things which are gain to us
in the things of the world and of the flesh as loss for Christ
(verse 7); counting all things as loss and of no value in
order to win Christ and counting the knowledge of Christ as a
very excellent thing (verse 8); being found in Christ and
having the righteousness of God in our lives through the faith
of Christ and not having our own righteousness (verse 9);
seeking to know Jesus Christ and the fellowship of His
sufferings and being conformed unto His death (verse 10);
seeking and desiring to attain unto the resurrection of the
righteous (verse 11); having a recognition of not having yet
attained and not yet being perfect, but steadfastly pursuing
those things (verse 12); and having a tendency of heart and
disposition of mind to forget the things behind and reach
forth unto those things which are before and to press on to
the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ
(verses 13 and 14). All of this is involved in the mind of the
perfect Christian.
After all, Christian perfection is not a matter of being
"right on target" every time in all of our choices, decisions,
judgments, and understanding, but it is a state, condition and
attitude of the heart toward God; having the right motives and
purposes in everything we do, even though we may fail
sometimes in our methods of doing them. God's Word says in II
Chronicles 16:9, "For the eyes of the Lord run to and fro
throughout the whole earth, to shew himself strong in the
behalf of them whose heart is perfect toward him...." I Samuel
16:7 says, "...The Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man
looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the
heart." Oh, how often we err in our judgments of one another
because we look on the outward appearance and after the seeing
of the eye and the hearing of the ear we fail to discern the
motive and purpose in the heart of the person who was trying
to do something good and failed in the proper method of doing
it. This is a stark tragedy, but is often repeated. God help
us!
phesians 4:13 speaks of us all coming to a perfect man. The
margin here says, "to age." The meaning of "perfect" in this
place is to grow up, or come to age or maturity in our
Christian experience. The same thought is set forth in I
Corinthians 14:20, where it says, "...In malice be ye
children, but in understanding be men." The margin here says
"perfect" instead of "men" in the text (grown up, fully
developed people spiritually).
I trust you will consider what I say and the Lord give you
understanding in all things. Let us all quit looking for the
perfect human who is "right on target" every time and never
makes a mistake. You will never find him. There is no such
person. Let us allow our brethren to be human and forgive them
for their human errors and innocent mistakes, and let us go on
striving for the faith of the gospel. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Not That Which Goeth into the
Mouth Defileth
Question: Please explain Matthew 15:11.
Answer: This verse reads thus: Not that which goeth
into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of
the mouth, this defileth a man.
This response came at the end of Jesus' answering of a
challenging question which was put to Him by the Pharisees.
The question was this: Why do thy disciples transgress the
tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when
they eat bread. (Verse 2.)
I beg permission to transfer the discussion to the seventh
chapter of Mark; the first 23 verses deal with the same thing
but go into more detail. Verse 3 explains their custom of
washing their hands, etc. It says, ....Except they wash their
hands oft, eat not, holding the tradition of the elders. Then,
verse 4 explains this a little farther by saying And when they
come from the market, except they wash, they eat not.... And
verse 4 continues on to say that many other things they have
received to hold as washing of cups, pots, etc. In verse 5
they asked Him why His disciples didn't observe these
traditions of the elders but ate with unwashed hands.
The words when they come from the market in verse 4 throws
considerable light on this point. Involved in this was the
fact that God had drawn a sharp line of separation between the
Jews and the Gentiles for His own particular purposes and set
the seal of circumcision upon the Jews to identify them as His
special people and forbade them to have any
intercommunications with the Gentiles, unless the Gentile
would be circumcised and become as one of them. God s
principle purpose in doing this was to have a pure stock that
He could set apart unto Himself and establish His covenant
with, and through them bring Christ into the world. He gave
them certain things to observe in order to establish in them
and through them, to the world, the idea of clean and unclean,
pure and impure, right and wrong principles, etc. The whole
system was principally ceremonial and had nothing in it to
purge the conscience and purify the heart and affections from
the polluting effects of sin. It required the blood of Jesus
to do this, and until His sacrifice of Himself on Calvary, the
standard of holiness maintained throughout the Old Testament
period was a ceremonial, external system which could not make
the comers thereunto perfect. Hebrews 7:19 says, For the law
made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope
did; by the which we draw nigh unto God. God pronounced unto
the Jews certain things which were unclean things which the
Gentiles practiced and commanded them not to do those things.
But the Jews had carried these things clear beyond the bounds
of what God had said, through the traditions of their elders.
The traditions of the elders were oral, or verbal, additions
to what God had commanded, which were written commandments,
and they had become as binding upon the Jews as the written
commandments of God. But God never recognized them. But the
Jews had carried the idea of clean and unclean to such an
extent that they considered the Gentiles unclean (physically),
and when they returned from the marketplace they washed their
hands and arms to the elbow to cleanse them from any
contamination they might have received because of brushing
against a Gentile. Perhaps, physically, the Gentiles were as
clean and well kept as the Jews, and such bigotry would be
difficult for us to imagine, but that is the extent to which
the traditions of the elders had carried it.
Mark 7:7-9 says, Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching
for doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the
commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the
washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye
do. And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment
of God, that ye may keep your own tradition. Then He proceeds
to point out to them a particular commandment which Moses had
commanded them from God which was a written commandment. Verse
10 points out a commandment Moses had given them which
enjoined them to honor their parents. Honor in this text
refers to assisting, maintaining, and supporting them. This
meaning of the word honor here is confirmed by what He said in
verse 11, that if the son should say to his parents that it
was a gift that is a consecrated gift to the temple that he
would be free from the obligation of helping his parents, and
in verse 13 He said, Making the word of God of none effect
through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such
like things do ye.
Then, in verse 15 Jesus said that nothing entering into a man
from without could defile him; but the things which come forth
out of him are what defile him. This thought is again
emphasized in verse 18. Verses 20-23 say, ...That which cometh
out of the man, that defileth the man. For from within, out of
the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries,
fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness,
deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride,
foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and
defile the man.
The weight of Matthew 15:11 comes down on us when we look at
the formal, external, outward, put-on type of religion that is
prevalent in many lives in our day. It can be said in our day
as Jesus said in His day, ...In vain they do worship me,
teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. (Matthew
15:9.) It is certainly true that God has a standard of dress
and general behavior and moral conduct and uprightness for
Christians to observe, and it is all found written in His
Word. But let us realize that it is possible to be misled by
putting all of our emphasis on externals behind which and
underneath which may be bad attitudes, unkind feelings,
unforgiveness, pride, bigotry, and many other things which
will keep people out of heaven.
In Matthew 23:23 Jesus told the scribes and Pharisees that
they paid tithes, etc., but had overlooked the weightier
matters of the law: judgment, mercy, and faith. Then He
concluded by saying, ...These ought ye to have done, and not
to leave the other undone." Oh, my brethren, let us govern all
phases of our life by this maxim and have our lives properly
balanced between the doing and the being, and have a good
relationship between our inward condition of heart and our
outward appearance and conduct. God have mercy on us and help
us to be all He is calling us to be, inside and out. |
|
|
|
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Self (Signs, Symptoms,
Manifestations)
Question: What are some of the signs or symptoms of
"SELF" and how does it manifest itself?
Answer: SELF is a predominant part of the depraved
nature which our father Adam received because of his
disobedience to the direct commandment of God. By this means
he lost the image of God (righteousness and true holiness)
(Colossians 3:10; Eph 4:24). The image of God was defaced and
in its place Adam received a fallen, depraved, sinful nature.
Not only was this so, but all his posterity received the same
nature that Adam had. Romans 5:12, says, "Wherefore, as by one
man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death
passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." This text
proves sin to be a universal thing and that is so because of
one man's sin. Romans 7:14 says, "For we know that the law is
spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin." But how did this
come about? Who sold him under sin? The answer is clear from
the above text (Rom 5:12); it was Adam. Paul refers to himself
(I) here, but actually he stands as a representative of the
whole human race. We are all in that same condition depraved
in our nature. This depraved nature has a side loaded toward
self and that is the side that keeps turning up in all
unregenerated men.
Self and the depraved, sinful nature are so intertwined
together that one cannot be destroyed without destroying the
other also. They must go together. Let me give you an example.
I knew a man who had a brain tumor. Surgeons opened up his
head and performed an operation, but they reported that the
roots and runners of the tumor were so intertwined throughout
the brain that they could not possibly get it all without
completely destroying him as a person and reducing him to a
mere "vegetable." Therefore they just took off the top of the
tumor, and as it grew and built up pressure in his head, they
repeated the operation in the same way. The man underwent nine
of these operations before his death. I once saw an
advertisement of a cold medicine which said, "Kill a cold
where a cold lives." Another place in the ad said, "A cold is
an internal infection."
This is the way with the self-life. You have to kill it where
it lives in the depraved nature. It is all intertwined in
there and one has to have that nature destroyed in order to
get it. Rom 6:6 says, "Knowing this, that our old man is
crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed,
that henceforth we should not serve sin." The "old man" in
this text refers to that depraved, sinful nature. Romans 6:11
says, "Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed
unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord."
Galatians 2:20 says, "I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless
I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which
I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God,
who loved me, and gave himself for me." Here is expressed life
without the "I" or "self" in it. Galatians 5:24 says, "And
they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the
affections and lusts." All of these texts refer to the old
depraved, sinful nature and the self-life which is an integral
part of it.
This experience (crucifying or dying out to self) is obtained
through consecration and faith; in the Scriptures this is
called "sanctification." Romans 12:1-2 says "I beseech you
therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present
your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God,
which is your reasonable service. And be not conformed to this
world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind,
that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and
perfect, will of God." And I Thessalonians 4:3 says, "For this
is the will of God, even your sanctification,..." Rom 12:1-2
explains how one is sanctified.
Self is something we cannot serve God with. Jesus knew this;
the very first condition of discipleship that He laid down was
to deny one's self. In Matthew 16:24, he said, "...If any man
will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his
cross, and follow me." The self-life is so opposite to the
Spirit and nature of Jesus Christ that it is obnoxious to Him
and we just cannot serve Him with it.
This all being true, let us look at some of the signs and
symptoms of self:
1. It will seek its own (its own way, profit, welfare,
pleasure, comfort, and satisfaction) rather than deny itself.
In Phil 2:21, Paul said this by way of lament, "For all seek
their own, not the things which are Jesus Christ's." In I
Corinthians 10:24, he said, "Let no man seek his own, but
every man another's wealth." In Philippians 2:4, he said,
"Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on
the things of others." We see in these texts that
self-seeking, self-promotion, and self-pleasing have no place
in the Christian life.
2. Self will demand the uttermost farthing (Matthew 5:26)
rather than go the second mile (Matthew 5:41). Try to
straighten up anything or seek a reconciliation with a man who
has been hurt or offended and is dominated by self and you
will find him "slapping you in the face" instead of turning
the other cheek (Matthew 5:39). He will be very exacting,
demanding, and hard to deal with. This is just the way self
behaves itself.
3. Self will contend for its own way and if not pleased, just
plain won't play rather than submitting and cooperating to
make any given project a success. In Ephesians 5:21, Paul
says, "Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of
God." This is the way of the Spirit and the way Christians are
to behave, but Self will never behave this way.
4. Self will get its feelings hurt and pout when crossed,
disappointed, or its proposals rejected, rather than
crucifying self and manifesting the Spirit of Christ who
pleased not Himself (Romans 15:1-3).
Self was manifested in the prodigal son in his seeking his own
way, personal interests, and freedom to do his own thing with
utter disregard for the feelings of his father and his
father's household. The prodigal's brother sought to promote
his own interests in another way, but showed the same contempt
for his father and his father's feelings; in the end he was as
obnoxious as his brother. He missed the kingdom of God, too.
Self is always obnoxious, and all who follow its pernicious
ways will miss the kingdom of God.
SELF thrives on attention and will pay any price to get it
whether good or bad. Sometimes when things have been going
rather smoothly for a time, a self-dominated person who has
been starved of attention will "throw a spell" or "act up,"
and create a commotion, or act naughty in order to get the
attention he craves.
Now I will identify SELF as a murderer and insurrectionist. He
may not like that exactly, but he will pay that price, too, in
order to draw attention to himself. Barabbas was a murderer
and insurrectionist and he stands as a topnotch type of SELF.
He stood directly opposed to Christ in Pilate's judgment hall
that day. Pilate, in his effort to release Jesus and save Him
that day, picked out the worst prisoner he had and set him up
against Christ and said to the Jews, "Which one of these two
shall I release unto you?" It would appear obvious, so Pilate
thought, that the choice here would be an easy one that the
Jews would choose Christ rather than Barabbas. But they
didn't. They said, "Crucify Jesus and give us Barabbas." In
the anti-type of this, the SELF-LIFE stands directly opposed
to the Christ-life in the hearts and lives of many people.
SELF will murder the Christ-life in your soul. There is no
possible grounds for coexistence of the two in the same heart.
Jesus said, "No man can serve two masters:..." Matthew 6:24.
Folks, when Jesus says a thing cannot be done, we should just
as well accept it that it can't be done and quit trying. A
choice must be made: We must in our hearts either say to give
us SELF and let the Christ-life die; or say to give us Christ
and let the SELF-LIFE die.
SELF is also an insurrectionist and will be continually and
perpetually rising up in rebellion against the laws of the
kingdom of God and the kingship of Jesus Christ. Jesus knew
that no man could serve Him while SELF was prevalent in his
life, so He just said for us to unload it at the start if we
intended to follow Him. In Matthew 16:24, He said, "...If any
man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his
cross, and follow me." Self-denial is the first condition of
discipleship.
We have another good example in type of SELF the Gibeonites.
They dealt wittingly and deceitfully with Joshua and the
elders of Israel and tricked them into making a league with
them. (9th chapter of Joshua.) Joshua and the elders very soon
learned that they had been tricked and deceived by the
Gibeonites but because of the league between them they could
not destroy them. But they were reduced to perpetual bondage
and servitude to be hewers of wood and drawers of water for
the Israelites. SELF must be put under. Paul expressed it this
way: "But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection:
lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I
myself should be a castaway." I Corinthians 9:27. Paul knew
the destructive power of the self-life and of the flesh so he
just put it down, kept it down, and never gave it a chance to
assert itself at all. God help you and me to do the same thing
with this pestilent fellow.
When a person actuated by SELF is hurt, he will go about
seeking someone to tell his hurt to in order to receive their
sympathy. Every person actuated by SELF relishes sympathy.
They feed on it and are nurtured by it. But the sad part is
that they will not shrink from destroying by slander and
gossip the person nearest to them in order to get sympathy.
The saddest part of all is that he is actually destroying
himself while, at the same time, being deceived into thinking
he is building himself up because of the sympathy he is
receiving from another. This makes the one extending sympathy
in such a case a contributor to the delinquency and
destruction of the one seeking sympathy.
This course of action is only feeding and nourishing that
which one should be seeking to mutilate and destroy. God
permits hurtful things to happen to us to give us an
opportunity to further destroy the self-life out of us. If we
cooperate with God at this point, humble our hearts and submit
to Him, the desired end will be obtained. But if we resent,
buck up against it, and go the sympathy seeking route, we will
feed and nourish that self-life with all of its destructive
powers within us and weaken ourselves to meet our problems in
life.
The courses we should follow in such cases are these: (1.)
When you are hurt and feel starved for sympathy and feel you
must get to some certain individual as soon as possible to
talk things over with him, just remain separate and aloof from
him and refuse to discuss your problem even if you are with
him. (2.) When you feel that you just have to say something
and if you don't say something you will burst, that is the
best time in the world to just keep quiet and say nothing.
(3.) When you feel strongly inclined to pout, just get more
talkative and more involved than usual in the activities going
on around. (4.) When you feel that you just want to give
someone a good "letting alone," just get closer to him and
become more conversant and friendly with him than ordinarily.
By these means and more we are cooperating with God in those
times to destroy the self-life and increase the Christ-life
within us.
We are told by the experts that self-preservation is the first
law of nature. The Bible verifies this, too. In Job 2:4, we
read, "...All that a man hath will he give for his life."
Therefore, I conclude that if you could only see the power of
SELF to destroy your health and happiness here and your
eternal life hereafter, you would be inclined to resent,
reject, and stoutly resist it by every effective means
available to you. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Saints and Anger
Question: Please discuss Ephesians 4:26. Can saints be
angry and be clear in it?
Answer: Ephesians 4:26 says, "Be ye angry, and sin not:
let not the sun go down upon your wrath."
The very wording of this text implies that anger is something
not to be tampered with or to take lightly. It indicates that
sin is at the door wherever anger is.
Weymouth's Translation says: "If angry, beware of sinning."
Williams' Translation says: "If you do get angry, you must
stop sinning in your anger."
Knox's Translation says: "Do not let resentment lead you into
sin."
Ephesians 4:26b says, "Let not the sun go down upon your
wrath."
Knox's Translation says: "Never go to bed angry."
The New English Bible says: "Do not let the sunset find you
still nursing it."
This all sums up the fact that it is very needful for the
saints to pray out from under their hurts, wounds, bruises,
agitated feelings, "disgust" and all unholy and improper
tendencies, dispositions, and attitudes, and to do it quickly.
It is a certain fact that if we do not do this and allow those
things to linger, they will produce roots of bitterness and
result in sin in our hearts.
When discussing a word or given phrase or principle connected
with a particular dominant word, we must endeavor first to
discover the varied meaning of that word.
Anger is defined in the World Book Dictionary of which
Clarence L. Barnhart is Editor in Chief, as the feeling one
has toward something or someone that hurts, opposes, offends,
or annoys; strong displeasure. Another definition which is
classified as obsolete is "grief, trouble."
Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms defines anger as denoting the
emotional excitement induced by intense displeasure. It refers
only to the emotional reaction; the word itself suggests no
definite degree of intensity and carries no necessary
implication of outward manifestation.
Ire is given as a synonym of anger. It suggests greater
intensity than anger, unqualified, and usually, but not
necessarily, a display of that feeling in looks, acts or
words.
Rage is another synonym. It adds to anger the implications of
lost self-control and of violent boiling over of feeling; it
often connotes a sense of frustration, or temporary
derangement of the mind, or determination to get revenge.
Fury is another synonym. It indicates overmastering
destructive rage verging on madness.
Indignation is another synonym. It implies depth and intensity
of anger, often righteous or generous anger, aroused by that
which one considers mean, shameful, or otherwise unworthy of a
man or men.
Wrath is another synonym. It may imply either rage or
indignation as its emotional basis; but in addition to either
of these, it also often implies a grievance and a desire or
intent to avenge or punish, or to get revenge.
In Romans 12:19-21 we read, "Dearly beloved, avenge not
yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is
written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give
him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on
his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with
good." We see here that where one's anger runs into some of
these unholy tendencies and reaches the point of frustration,
vengeance or desire for revenge or to see one punished; it is
already out of bounds for a Christian and running into sin. We
are instructed here to just keep our hands off and let God
have His way in the execution of vengeance upon evil doers.
But as for us, we are to show kindness and do good unto our
enemies and just let God decide who deserves vengeance and to
what extent.
Phillip's Translation says: "Never take vengeance into your
own hands, my dear friends."
Moffit's Translation says: "But let the wrath of God have its
way."
Goodspeed's Translation says: "But leave room for God's
anger."
Montgomery's Translation (The New Testament in Modern English)
says: "But leave the field clear for God's wrath."
Knox's Translation says: "Allow retribution to run its
course."
All of this makes it clear that there is a line beyond which
Christian people must not go, and to go beyond that line is
certainly sin. Also, we can stand in the way and hinder God in
executing judgment on evil doers by taking things into our own
hands and executing vengeance upon an individual in our own
behalf. What we should do in such cases is follow the example
of our Master and commit ourselves into the hands of Him who
judgeth righteously I Peter 2:23.
However, in all the various degrees of anger and the different
definitions of the word anger, there is a place for saints to
exercise anger and we would not be worth much to the cause of
God and right without it. But we are admonished in the text to
be careful in such cases not to go beyond that range of anger
that is suitable for saints and give place to the devil and
run into sin.
Again the World Book Dictionary draws a distinction in the use
of the term angry. 1. When the angry feeling is stressed, and
2. When the directing of the anger upon a person is stressed.
This is an important difference in this discussion.
One may feel highly displeased and deeply grieved and much
troubled (angry) over some meanness, injustice, harshness, or
cruelty in word or action by one person toward another. This
would be justifiable and we should feel grieved and displeased
(angry) at those things. One would not be worth much to God
who would not be exercised in grief and displeasure by such
things. But when one turns this same disposition toward the
individual who did the wrong and burns in their resentment and
anger toward the person until wrath is kindled and we desire
to see him punished or vengeance executed upon him; that is a
destructive anger and we should rise up in opposition to it
and cast it from us before it be our ruin.
In Proverbs 24:17-18, we read, "Rejoice not when your enemy
falls, and let not your heart be glad when he stumbles or is
overthrown; lest the Lord see it, and it be evil in His eyes
and displeases Him, and He turn away His wrath from him (to
expend it upon you, the worse offender) " Amplified Bible.
Adam Clarke says this appears to be the sense of this text and
also quotes another eminent authority, Cloverdale, as applying
it in the same way. so, it appears evident that we can hinder
the execution of judgment and vengeance by God Himself and
even bring judgment upon ourselves by holding a wrong attitude
toward any person. An anger of this kind will breed malice and
bitterness which are strongly condemned by God's Word.
Some may say, "I have a righteous indignation against the
principle of the thing but not toward any person." Well, good.
That is right and justifiable. But let us apply a little test
to that and see. If it is the principle of the thing you are
offended at, you will feel just as grieved and hurt (angry)
when you see some mean or unjust thing done to another person
as if that thing were done to you. But if you can see someone
do a mean or unjust thing to another person and just pass it
off and say, "I am not going to meddle with anything that does
not concern me," then let someone do the same thing to you and
get all agitated about it, upset, and your peace disturbed;
that is just your feeling sorry for yourself. It is not the
principle or thing at all, but this is ME and they just ought
not to do ME this way.
In conclusion, let us summarize. It seems certain from the
Scriptures that there is a certain kind of anger that is
justifiable and we could not be true to right principles
without being stirred at certain things in certain ways.
In Mark 3:5, we read of Jesus, "...When He had looked round
about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of
their hearts,..." Here Jesus had anger. But we could never
imagine His having carnal resentment and behaving according to
the way some humans do when they become angry. Just try to
imagine His getting red in the face, shouting obscenities at
the people, and throwing His hands around and threatening the
people. We could not even imagine such a thing. His anger in
this case consisted in His being grieved, or hurt, at the
hardness of their heart, obstinacy and unbelief. This should
affect all of us in the same way.
In Colossians 3:8, we are commanded to "put off anger, wrath,
and malice."
Ephesians 4:31 says, "Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger
be put away from you."
Ephesians 4:27 is the finish or conclusion of verse 26. It
says "Neither give place to the devil."
The 20th Century New Testament says, "And give no opportunity
to the devil."
Goodspeed's Translation says, "You must not give the devil a
chance."
Phillip's Translation says, "Don't give the devil that sort of
foothold."
The New English Bible says, "Leave no loop-hole for the
devil."
If we allow the sparks of displeasure, anger, and indignation
to linger in our hearts and minds and smolder there until some
circumstance or provocation fans them into a flame, we
certainly are giving place to the devil; and sin lieth at the
door and will rise up and take us and cause us to act or speak
in unkind, bitter and hurtful ways. The only safe way for us
is to commit our ways unto God and pray out from under our
hurts, wounds, and offenses quickly; cast out all anger and
have victory over every unkind feeling and thought toward any
person. Our attitude must be love toward all men including our
enemies. But at the same time we are to have and hold a
resentment and anger toward the devil and all of his works.
|
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
The Carnal Mind
Question: Please explain I Corinthians 3:1 and Romans
8:6. How can these two Scriptures be harmonized?
Answer: Let us first insert these texts in full. I
Corinthians 3:1 reads thus, "And I, brethren, could not speak
unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto
babes in Christ." Romans 8:6-7 reads thus, "For to be carnally
minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and
peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it
is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." The
thought in the mind of the questioner seems to be "How could
people be brethren and babes in Christ and still be carnal
when it is plainly stated in Romans 8:6 that to be carnally
minded is death?"
I will say at the first that this is a fair question and a
good one and I will do my utmost under God to answer it as
clearly and as understandably as is possible for me in my own
limited understanding.
We will first consider the CARNAL MIND as mentioned in Romans
8:6-7. Matthew Henry says of it "(1.) It is death. It is
spiritual death, the certain way to alienation from God, in
union and communion with whom the life of the soul consists.
(2.) It is enmity to God, and this is worse than the first.
The former speaks the carnal sinner a dead man, which is bad;
but this speaks him a devil of a man. It is not only an enemy
but enmity itself. It is not only the alienation of the soul
from God, but the opposition of the soul against God; it
rebels against His authority, thwarts His design, opposes His
interest, spits in His face, spurns at His bowels. Can there
be a greater enmity? An enemy may be reconciled, but enmity
cannot."
Let us look a little closer at this carnal MIND. First of all,
bear in mind that it is the carnal MIND that is under
consideration. Confusing the carnal MIND with the carnal
NATURE or native depravity has led some to a conclusion which
has fed error rather than truth and that one who possessed
this carnal mind could not live a justified life before God,
free from committing sin; because the Bible said that the
carnal mind was not subject to the law of God and could not
be. They conclude that the carnal nature is removed in
justification because one could not live justified with it
because it was not subject to the law of God. This mixture of
identification leads to confusion and error in the light of
all the general tenor of Scripture.
"Carnal" is used in the Scriptures in contradistinction to
"Spiritual" and pertains to the things of the flesh in
contradistinction to the things of the spirit. The dictionary
carnal is defined as "Of or pertaining to the body as the seat
of appetites. Fleshly. Lacking spirituality, unregenerate,
worldly." In Romans 8:6 "To be carnally minded" the margin
says, "Minding of the flesh." Therefore the carnal MIND would
have reference to the thoughts, plans, schemes, connivings and
meditations of the mind for ways and means to satisfy the
desires of the flesh.
Ecclesiastes 7:29 says, "...God hath made man upright; but
they have sought out many inventions."
First of all this text carries the thought that man's
inventions have off-set his uprightness and led him away from
God. Invention is defined as "fabrication of the imagination a
device, contrivance or the like originated after study and
experiment." Again invent is defined as " To fabricate
mentally create or devise in the imagination." Thus we see
that in this text man's inventions would refer to his studying
and experimenting, creating and devising in his imaginations
and fabricating mentally (in his mind) devices and ways and
means to glorify himself and satisfy the desires of his flesh
(natural man).
Lest we overlook some of the emphasis of this, let us go a
little farther with it. Invention is defined as a "fabrication
of the imagination." But imagination is defined as "a scheme,
plot or project, especially of evil a mental image a creation
of the mind." In Genesis 6:5 it says that God saw that
"...every imagination [creations of men's minds] of the
thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." In other
words, men were continually creating in their minds schemes,
plots and projects of evil to satisfy the desires of their
flesh according to their depraved natures.
Also the word Imagine is defined as "To form a mental picture
of: to produce by the imagination; to contrive in purpose, to
scheme; to fancy, think, suppose." One of the definitions of
the word imagine is "to fancy" and fancy is defined as "the
object of one's interest." Projecting this thought into the
text of Genesis 6:5, it indicates that these people were
primarily interested in evil and in devising ways and means to
execute their evil plots, plans, and schemes.
In Psalm 36:4, speaking of the wicked it says "He deviseth
mischief upon his bed;..." Again speaking of the wicked in
Proverbs 6:14 it says, "...he deviseth mischief
continually;..." In these texts and several more it speaks of
DEVISING mischief. Cruden's Concordance says that in the
Scriptures mischief is very frequently used to denote
wickedness and iniquity. Devise is defined as "to form in the
mind by new combination of ideas. Invent, contrive, to plan
for." Further, contrive is defined as "to devise, plan, to
form schemes or designs." In other words, this makes it plain
that those who devised mischief were planning, scheming,
designing and seeking, even by new ideas in their minds, how
to accomplish their evil, fleshly desires.
Now all of this shows the disposition of the carnal MIND; that
it is continually inventing, fabricating, imagining, studying,
experimenting, creating, devising, scheming, plotting,
contriving, purposing, etc. for projects of evil and fleshly
indulgence. Of course, such a mind would produce spiritual
death and would be enmity against God and would not and could
not be subject to the law of God and no person could be a
child of God and be governed by such a mind. Let me emphasize
that it is the carnal mind under consideration and the not the
carnal nature native depravity. There is a difference.
The term native depravity indicates a depravity of nature at
birth. Then it is something in the nature of the infant child.
" The Scriptures conclude something about sin being
hereditary, a depravity of nature to be handed down through
the generations of mankind from the original parent." Romans
5:12-17 declares all men to be under the dismal sway of sin
and further proves that they are thus affected because of one
man and his sin and also declares that one man to be Adam who
was the royal head of the human family. This could not be true
unless there is something hereditary about sin.
For a thing to be hereditary it must be inherent in a child at
birth and not something acquired later on in life. Hence; this
depravity of nature must be in the infant child at birth. I
believe that in general we would all agree with this. But the
carnal mind could not be existent in an infant child at birth
because he would not be capable of exercising his mind to
invent, study, fabricate, imagine, scheme, plot, purpose and
create projects of evil and fleshly indulgence. Thus we see
that the carnal mind could not possibly be identical with the
carnal nature but is a product of it and is acquired by those
who are more advanced and developed in capacity and ability
and established in the practices of carnal, fleshly desires
and is therefore more attached to the actual fleshly life than
to the nature only.
Colossians 2:18 mentions man as "...vainly puffed up by his
fleshly mind." "Fleshly mind" and "Carnal mind" are one and
the same thing and belong to the fleshly life. When one puts
off the deeds or works of the flesh which are cataloged in a
general way in Galatians 5:19-21 and repents of his sins and,
through faith in Christ, is saved (born again) and receives
the Christ life into his soul which is called "Newness of
life" in Romans 6:4; he also receives a renewing in the spirit
of his mind (Ephesians 4:23). In other words, the disposition
and tendencies of his mind are changed to conform to the
change in his heart and life. Therefore, the mind of one who
is saved is not scheming, planning, plotting and inventing
projects for satisfying fleshly desires, but rather thinking,
planning and meditating on ways and means whereby he may
maintain and improve his spiritual life and better please God
and may have more time and opportunity to engage in His
service.
In this 8th chapter of Romans, Paul is pointing out a line of
distinction between the flesh and spirit and in the course of
the discussion deals with the fleshly or carnal mind and the
spiritual mind. In fact, the major portion of the Epistle to
the Romans is dealing with such distinctions and opposites law
and grace, Jews versus Gentiles, and works of the law versus
faith in Christ, flesh and spirit, etc. These people are not
charged with having or manifesting a carnal mind but are just
admonished or warned of the consequences of following such a
mind. In fact, we would judge from this epistle that in the
main thought the Church of God at Rome was quite spiritual,
prosperous and thriving.
In the 3rd chapter of I Corinthians the case is different. No
mention is made here of a carnal mind but the church at
Corinth is complained against and is definitely charged with
being carnal. However, Paul addressed them as "Brethren" and
as "Babes in Christ;" and it is evident that they were alive
and could be fed because Paul said he was feeding them with
milk and not meat. This would be true of all babes. In their
baby state they could not digest solid food; and Paul
complained of these folks at Corinth that they were not able
to bear meat (the strong, deep truths of the gospel) but must
still have milk (the very simple, elementary truths and
instructions of Christian living).
These folks were not charged with being activated by the
carnal mind (scheming, imagining, contriving, devising and
dreaming up ways to satisfy the fleshly desires and
appetites). Their situation was that they were all new
converts to the Christian faith and were in a baby state in
their Christian experience, and had no degree of advancement
in the things of God and had not learned the ways of God and
how Christians behave. These folks were still possessed of the
native depravity of mankind perhaps without even knowing it,
or anything about the need of entire sanctification which
eradicates that principle. Perhaps they did not even know they
were supposed to resist such tendencies as they were
manifesting here and did not know what was prompting them and
they were just behaving like natural men behave. However, it
was not the satisfaction of evil and sinful pleasures and
lusts of the flesh they were seeking after here, but just to
have their own way and likes which is the predominant
characteristic of the carnal nature or native depravity. The
extent of the thing manifested here was that they became
activated by a party spirit and preference of preachers and
continued in it to the point of factions and divisions.
We may condemn them for that and certainly they should not be
commended for it because it was wrong and still is wrong
today. Let us not overlook the fact that there are not just a
few among us today who are well instructed in the truths of
justification and sanctification and how saints should behave
themselves and be in unity and be one in Christ Jesus and in
all the truths of the gospel who are guilty of this same thing
and have to have their own way and still profess to be saved
and sanctified. Some who contend that these folks could not
possibly be saved at all on this account are guilty of the
same thing, too, and tear the body of Christ in sunder because
the saints do not accept their position.
Let us look well at these folks. True, they did not behave
themselves as more mature saints would, because they were not
more mature than they were and were not established in the
ways of the Lord. There were many irregularities in that
Corinthian church. There is much reproof and even some rebuke
given them for their errors throughout the first epistle Paul
wrote to them. It becomes evidently certain that these people
had no evil intent or purpose and were not controlled by a
carnal mind which was inventing, contriving, imagining,
planning, plotting, purposing to discover ways and means to
satisfy the desires of the flesh. It is evident and clear, I
say, because when Paul had written them and reproved them for
their errors and irregularities, they accepted that and moved
up and measured up and in Paul's second Epistle to them, he
commended them and told them in chapter 7, verse 11 "...In all
things ye have approved yourselves to be clear in this
matter." This would certainly prove that those folks were
intent upon growing spiritually, advancing, and increasing in
the things of God which could never be true of people
dominated by the carnal mind. (II Corinthians 7:11) |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Poor in Spirit
Question: Would you please explain the meaning and
import of Jesus' reference to "poor in spirit" in His opening
statement of the "Sermon On The Mount" in Matthew 5:3?
Answer: This verse says, "Blessed are the poor in
spirit: for their's is the kingdom of heaven." We see here
that being "poor in spirit" is stated by Jesus Himself as a
prime requisite of entering the kingdom of heaven and should
therefore be considered worthy of close attention and study.
I will begin the discussion by injecting two other scriptures
into it which may help to clarify its meaning. Isaiah 61:1 in
describing the mission and ministry of Christ says this: "The
Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath
anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek;..." The word
"meek" here is the key word. Then in the fourth chapter of
Luke, verses 16-21 tell that Jesus came to Nazareth and went
into the synagogue and there was handed Him the book of Esaias
to read and He read this very prophecy of Isaiah 61:1. He read
in verse 18, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he
hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor;..." The
word "poor" is the key word here. We see that the same word
that is translated "meek" in Isaiah 61:1 is translated "poor"
in Luke 4:18, and makes it clear that "poor in spirit" is
related to meekness and humility. Jesus could have said,
"Blessed are the humble for their's is the kingdom of heaven"
and it would have meant the same thing.
So let us study humility a little because without it one can
never enter the kingdom of heaven. The proud in heart can
never be saved until they renounce pride and become humble
enough to repent and confess their need of God and help from
Him. Poor is defined as having little or no resources. That is
the condition we must reach before we can approach unto God;
poor, bankrupt, no goodness of our own to plead. Some of the
words in an old hymn say, "Nothing in my hand I bring; simply
to thy cross I cling." That is the way we must come to God if
we are to receive mercy and grace from God. "...God resisteth
the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble." James 4:6. We
cannot use any good things we have done as bargaining points
with God when we want Him to save us or want any other favor
from Him. Actually God Himself hath said in Isaiah 64:6 that
"...all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags;..." That
surely is not much of a bargaining commodity, so let none of
us try to use it in seeking God for salvation or any other
favor from God. In Isaiah 54:7 we read, "...their
righteousness is of me, saith the Lord." That is the only
righteousness God will recognize just that which He has
wrought in us. So in order to enter the kingdom of God we must
empty ourselves of all our self-righteousness and just throw
ourselves entirely on the mercies of God and trust Him to
cleanse us from all our righteousness and fill us with His own
righteousness.
In Luke 18:9-14, Jesus gave us some very clear teaching on
this point. He told of two men who went up to the temple to
pray a Pharisee and a publican. The Pharisee's prayer was full
of commendatory remarks about himself and what he had done.
All the things he said were good, commendable things. All true
saints observe those things in their lives, too. There was
nothing wrong with the things he did. They were right. But
using them as bargaining material with God and commending
himself to God on that grounds was not acceptable. On the
other hand, the publican standing afar off and feeling so
spiritually bankrupt and poverty-stricken, and having
absolutely nothing to commend him to the Lord, smote upon his
breast in the anguish of his soul and said, "God, be merciful
to me a sinner." This prayer has come to be recognized the
world around, even today, as "The Sinner's Prayer." God
accepted that prayer and rejected the Pharisee's prayer even
though he said many good things about himself. Jesus said the
publican went down to his house justified rather than the
Pharisee. Pharisaical religion (self-righteousness; a formal,
external religion and worship) is the plague and curse of
modern religion. They are missing the kingdom of God on
account of it just as the Pharisee in Luke 18:9-14 did. It is
still true that the humble people possess the kingdom of God.
In John 15:5 Jesus said, "...Without me ye can do nothing."
Oh, let us ever be mindful of this and never boast ourselves
or take credit to ourselves even inwardly, where nobody can
know, for anything that God has wrought in or through us, but
always acknowledge God and give Him all the credit and glory
for everything, that we may continue to abide in and possess
the kingdom of God.
Again Jesus said in Luke 12:25-26 that we could not, by taking
thought, (worrying about it) add one cubit to our stature or
turn one hair white or black. He then concluded His thought by
saying that if we could not do the things that are least, why
worry about the rest? Ah, folks, we will all do well to
recognize and confess our insufficiencies and inabilities
within ourselves and throw ourselves totally into the hands of
God for Holy Ghost enablement for Him to work in us of His own
good pleasure. Paul said, "I can do all things through Christ
which strengtheneth me." (Philippians 4:13.) So please, let us
not throw up our hands and quit because of a consciousness of
our total insufficiencies, but let us throw ourselves totally
on God and trust in Him to endow us with His all-sufficient
power and strength to enable us to do everything He wants us
to do.
We can only be worthy of God's divine blessings and favors in
our lives, and of salvation itself, so long as we keep our
faith in the merits of the shed blood of the Son of God and
the sacrifice He made in our behalf. It is only through His
sacrifice and our faith in it that we have any access to God
at all. Let us never forget this for one moment. Let us never
think that God owes us anything at all for any service we have
rendered or any good thing we have done. As soon as we do this
we become unworthy of the least of His favors that very
moment.
In I Peter 5:5-7 Peter said this, "Likewise, ye younger,
submit yourselves unto the elder. Yea, all of you be subject
one to another, and be clothed with humility: for God
resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble. Humble
yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may
exalt you in due time: Casting all your care upon him; for he
careth for you." Again in Philippians 2:5 we read, "Let this
mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus." The following
verses tell of His condescension and humility in emptying
Himself of the position, glory and honor He had with the
Father in heaven, and condescending to come down to this world
of human beings and taking our likeness upon Him and becoming
obedient to His Father's will, even to death. Folks, this is
great condescension, beyond our comprehension to fathom. But
we read in verses 9-11 how God highly exalted Him and gave Him
a name which is above every name.
Now to sum up a little to this point: In I Peter 5:5-7, Peter
is giving instructions to ministers, pastors, overseers,
elders young and old and exhorting them to be humble,
submissive and subject one to another. Ah, brethren, we are to
set the pace and furnish an example to the saints of what we
teach them. If we teach them humility, be humble ourselves.
Let us teach them by example as well as by precept and
instruct them to behave themselves among themselves and get
along among themselves just like they see us behaving and
getting along among ourselves. The Church of God cannot
operate smoothly and function properly outside of this
perimeter.
There is a certain prescribed kind of humility saints are to
have. A genuine lowliness of mind and humility of heart is to
characterize the life and behavior of the saints not a
voluntary or "put on" humility which is very distasteful to a
genuinely humble person. It is Christ's humility we are to be
clothed with. "Let this mind be in you, which was also in
Christ Jesus." Philippians 2:5. This is a lowly mind.
(Philippians 2:8.) In Romans 13:14 we are instructed to put on
Christ. That is, be clothed with His divine virtue of
humility, from which all other graces flow.
But let us make no mistake about it; we are to walk in Christ
after the same manner in which we received Him. (Colossians
2:6.) The kingdom of God belongs to humble and lowly people.
If, in order to enter the kingdom of heaven, we must become
poor and stripped of our resources and drop all our claims to
any mercies or favors from God and just recognize ourselves as
undone and "Nothing in my hand I bring; Simply to thy cross I
cling," we must surely maintain our citizenship in the kingdom
of God by the same means. So it can still be said, "Blessed
are the poor in spirit: for their's is the kingdom of heaven,"
whether we are just entering in or remaining in. We remain in
the kingdom of God by the same means by which we enter the
kingdom of God.
Since it is Christ's humility we are to be clothed with, it
must manifest itself in the same way in us that it did with
Him. In His humility He made Himself of no reputation.
(Philippians 2:7.) Another translation says, "He emptied
Himself." Then it must work the same way in us. We must empty
ourselves of all self-interest, self-promotion,
self-advancement, all self-seeking, (I Corinthians 10:24;
Philippians 2:4), self-planning, etc. As we empty out self, we
will be more filled with God. In John 3:30, John the Baptist
said, "He must increase, but I must decrease." Oh, what a
great truth this is. Christ cannot increase in us until we
decrease in our own self life. Christ can only expand in us to
the extent we make room for Him. There is an old hymn which I
have seen but have never heard. It contains four verses, and
those four verses tell the whole story step by step. The first
verse says, "All of self and none of God." The second verse
says, "Some of self and some of God." The third verse says,
"Less of self and more of God." The fourth verse says, "None
of self and all of God." Ah, folks, there you have it; an
emptying out of self and a filling up with God; we decrease
and God increases in our lives.
Jesus humbled Himself and became obedient. (Philippians 2:8.)
Genuine humility involves obedience. God's Word establishes a
clear chain of obedience. This begins in the home. Wives are
to be obedient unto their own husbands. (Ephesians 5:22;
Colossians 3:18; Titus 2:5; I Peter 3:1, etc.) Children are to
be obedient to their parents. (Ephesians 6:1; Colossians
3:20.) Parents should also teach their children a broader
scope of obedience beyond the home; their teachers in school
and anyone else who has authority over children and the
management of children by reason of the position he holds or
the office he occupies which has to do with children.
Everybody husbands, wives, parents, children, teachers, etc.
is instructed to obey the laws and ordinances of men and be
law-abiding citizens. In the spiritual realm, saints are
instructed to obey their pastors who are in charge and
exercise oversight and watch for their souls and spiritual
welfare. (Hebrews 13:7, 17.) It also teaches ministers of the
gospel, including pastors, overseers, elders and all
classifications and callings, to be subject one to another. (I
Peter 5:5.)
Right along with this instruction, Peter admonished all of
them to be clothed with humility (I Peter 5:5) and to humble
themselves under the mighty hand of God. (Verse 6.) God's plan
and arrangement for the Church to operate by cannot possibly
function smoothly and effectively without humility on the part
of everyone connected with it. God knew all of this, so He set
it up to function and be well-lubricated with humility and all
of its outflowing graces and virtues. He certainly will not
long allow anyone who gets lifted up with pride and personal
ambition to be detained in the kingdom of God. So again, the
final conclusion is, "Blessed are the poor in spirit [humble]:
for their's is the kingdom of heaven." Matthew 5:3.
|
|
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
If Ye Salute Your Brethren Only
Question: Please comment on Matthew 5:47.
Answer: Matthew 5:47 reads thus: "And if ye salute your
brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the
publicans so?" Now let us break this verse up a little. The
first phrase is "If ye salute your brethren only." The 20th
Century New Testament says "if ye show courtesy to your
brethren only." Goodspeed's translation says "and if you are
polite to your brothers and no one else." Phillip's
translation says "and if you exchange greetings only with your
own circle." All of these together "salute," "show courtesy,"
"you are polite," "exchange greetings" cover the whole scope
of our general association with our fellows. Adam Clarke
comments at this place that "brethren in this text would be
properly rendered "friends." Then the whole scope of our
association and attitude with our immediate circle of friends
is comprehended here and it is altogether congenial.
The second phrase is, "What do ye more than others?"
Rotheram's translation renders this "What more than common are
you doing?" Waymouth's translation says "Are you doing
anything remarkable?" Olaf Norlie's translation says, "Does
that give you any special distinction?"
The last phrase says, "Do not even the publicans so?"
Rotheram's translation uses the term "the nations" instead of
"the publicans." The James Moffatt translation says, "Do not
the very pagans do as much?" The Centenary translation by
Helen Montgomery says, "Even the Gentiles do that, do they
not?" Beck's translation inserts "the people of the world" in
place of "the publicans."
This seems to me to cover the whole scope of the direct
meaning of this text. If we are courteous, polite, exchange
greetings, and are congenial and friendly with our friends and
brethren only, that in no way distinguishes us from the
worldly crowd; because they all do the same. Matthew 5:47 is
in a context with a number of verses which begin with verse 43
and continue through verse 48. So let us backtrack a little
and consider the whole context and see how verse 47 fits in
with the overall discussion of these verses.
"Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy
neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your
enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate
you, and pray for them that despitefully use you, and
persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father
which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil
and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the
unjust. For if you love them which love you, what reward have
ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your
brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the
publicans so? Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father
which is in heaven is perfect." Matthew 5:43-48.
In these verses is described the attitude of God, our heavenly
Father, and His generous mercies toward all mankind; both the
good and the evil, and how He gives rain and causes the sun to
shine on all of them alike. Paul referred to this same
disposition of the living God (Acts 14:15) when speaking to
the heathens at Lystra in Acts 14:17 where he said that "...He
did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons,
filling our hearts with food and gladness." This, then, is the
attitude and disposition of God toward humankind generous and
merciful. He has certain mercies that He dispenses to both the
good and the evil. Of course, we understand that He has a
special package of mercies which He reserves for His own (the
righteous children of God). He enjoins upon us, His children,
to be the same. In Galatians 6:10 we read, "As we have
therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially
unto them who are of the household of faith." The law standard
said, "Love your neighbour and hate your enemy." However,
Jesus came to offer the sacrifice of Himself for sin and to
save us from our sins and establish the New Covenant with
mankind that demanded a much higher standard of life than the
law of Moses afforded. Jesus requires that we love our
enemies, bless them that curse us, do good to them that hate
us, and pray for those who despitefully use us and persecute
us. (Matthew 5:44.) He said we would have to be like this in
order to be the children of our Father in heaven. (Verse 45.)
The salvation which Jesus established and provided is to make
us partakers of the divine nature of God (II Peter 1:4) which
makes us a partaker of the attitude and disposition toward
humankind as is described to us in this group of verses
(Matthew 5:43-48). Verse 47 has its setting in this context
and teaches us that we must have a generous, kind, benevolent,
considerate and courteous attitude and disposition toward all
humankind, friend or foe. It forever obliterates clannishness
from the hearts and lives of the children of God. To be
perfect before God, we must be like this.
The exact same thing is taught in the group of verses
immediately preceding this group of verses we have just been
studying (Matthew 5:39-42) where it says, "But I say unto you,
That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy
right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will
sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy
cloak also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go
with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him
that would borrow of thee turn not thou away."
Now let us realize that all Scripture must be interpreted in
its proper context. Therefore, the last verse of this group of
verses (verse 42) which says, "Give to him that asketh thee,
and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away,"
must be interpreted in context with the entire group of verses
with which it is connected. These verses (38-41) teach us what
attitude we should have toward our adversaries, of whatever
dimension they are, and how we should respond to those who
would oppress us, treat us unjustly and persecute us. We
should go all out, even beyond reasonable and required bounds,
to give satisfaction to the claims of anyone with whom we
become involved. Then the general thought concludes with this
42nd verse which says, "Give to him that asketh thee,..." In
other words; if one of your adversaries one who has smitten
you on your cheek, sued you in the court and gained a judgment
against you (justly or unjustly) or has taken undue advantage
of you and compelled you to do something he had no right to
require of you needs help and comes to you and asks a gift or
help or asks you to loan him something to enable him to meet
an emergency, grant him the favor just as you would a friend.
Never refuse him a favor just because he has mistreated you.
This is exactly the same truth that is taught in Matthew 5:47
and its related verses. God is looking for people who can meet
their problems in a different way than the man of the world
meets his. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
|
| |
When Thou Fastest (On Seeking
Praise & Reward)
Question: What is the meaning of Matthew 6:17, "But thou, when
thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face; That thou
appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in
secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward
thee openly." Matthew 6:17-18. Does the clause "anoint thine
head" refer to a literal interpretation?
Answer: The whole major thrust of the first eighteen verses of
the sixth chapter of Matthew is aimed at getting true
Christian people away from the idea of seeking any praise,
commendation or reward from men for what we do in service or
worship to God and doing whatever we do in these areas
"...heartily as to the Lord, and not unto men" Colossians
3:23. We see in these verses how that the serpentine influence
of self interest and self promotion and aggrandizement can
creep into and slither across our deepest acts of devotion and
charity giving alms, praying and fasting.
Jesus presented these whole ideas as hypocritical acts. They
were doing these things and announcing their doing and
sounding their trumpets so that men would be sure to notice
and give them credit and praise. This is all a very
destructive thing to one's relationship with God and to
Christian living. Jesus said these people had their reward
that men would see them and praise them but they had no reward
from God. This is an attitude to be religiously avoided by
true Christian people.
Jesus said, "How can ye believe, which receive honour one of
another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?"
John 5:44. We are certainly not to seek praise and
commendation from men for what we do for God and for our acts
of devotion and worship to God.
In the particular part of this over-all teaching on this
subject the matter of fasting and how to carry it out we are
instructed in general to do nothing special to let men know we
are fasting. The anointing of the head (one translation says
"pour perfume on your hair" and another translation says
"brush your hair"), was a normal part of Jewish grooming but
it was forbidden by their canon in times of fasting and
humiliation. But what Jesus seems to be teaching us here is
that when we fast we should groom ourselves as usual and dress
ourselves as usual and not in any special garment of mourning
as those people did, that we might not appear unto men to be
fasting.
It is evident and clear that this is no part of the fasting
itself because Jesus continues on to say "That thou appear not
unto men to fast."
True Christians should always avoid any tendency to vaunt
themselves in anything they do for God and not seek credit
from their fellow men for those things. Let us be satisfied
with the credit and reward that God gives unto those who serve
Him in the right attitude of heart. This will help our
"togetherness" with God which is a very precious thing with
the child of God. It is a very rewarding and enriching thing
to one's life when God rewards Him for doing something as unto
Him. We are taught by Jesus to "Let your light so shine before
men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father
which is in heaven." (Matthew 5:16.) Truly, all glory belongs
to God and let us be satisfied for Him to get it from our
lives. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
|
| |
Motes & Beams (Faultfinding)
Question: "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in
thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in
thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me
pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in
thine own eye?" Matthew 7:3-4.
Answer: The question of this article is one Jesus
Himself asked. Jesus asked a number of very pertinent and
thought-provoking questions to which He did not directly give
the answers. This is one of them. He put forth this very
straightforward question to faultfinding, nit-picking,
judging, criticizing people and did not give the answer to it.
But there are some answers to it and Jesus left us to find
them. Surely every earnest, honest, sincere person who is
endeavoring to serve and honor Christ will search out the
answers and seek to avoid the causes they discover.
The very setting of this text and the principal objects in the
text will be sufficient to convince any of us that Jesus was
not commending this kind of behavior, but rather condemning it
and warning us against it. One object in the text is a man
with a mote in his eye; the other object is a man with a beam
in his eye. Now, to be fair we will have to acknowledge that
there is an extraneous, foreign substance in the eyes of both
men; something in their lives that needs to be corrected. But
a man with a beam in his eye (a log or big timber; a glaring
fault) is not the man to try to extract the mote out of his
brother's eye.
If this little story were reversed, it would make better
sense; if the man with the mote in his eye were trying to help
the brother get the beam out of his eye, he could probably see
sufficiently well to get hold of the beam and extract it. But
Jesus did not set it up that way; He did not intend to. In
setting it up this way, He was trying to make faultfinding,
mote hunting, nit-picking, and criticizing appear just as
ridiculous as possible and something to be laughed out of
court at the very outset. In verse 5, He declared the man with
the beam a hypocrite. He instructed him to get the beam out of
his own eye (straighten out his own life) before going after
the man with the mote. Note: Jesus nowhere intimated that the
man with the mote did not need to get rid of his mote but
indicated that he might need some help to do it. But He did
make it unmistakably clear that the man with the beam was not
qualified to do it as long as he had his beam. However, verse
5 does indicate that this very same man with the beam could
turn out to be the man who could help the man with the mote if
he got rid of his beam and got his life straightened out. It
is remarkable to note how effectively God can use a person in
helping others who have been way out and far off course, if he
will just see his need, confess it, humble his heart, repent,
straighten out his life, and just come clear and clean with
God.
In verse 6, Jesus speaks about not giving the holy things to
dogs nor casting pearls before swine. So it is evident that in
these verses He is not forbidding us to properly evaluate the
worth of other people. How could we avoid giving holy things
to dogs and casting pearls before swine if we had no God-given
ability to discern who was swinish or doggish? But what is
actually involved here is a rebuke of an attitude on anyone's
part to look for the worst instead of the best. Blindness to
his own faults has overtaken the man who is looking for
specks. My father used to say that mote hunters got their
hunting licenses from the devil. A person would not likely see
a mere speck unless he was actually looking for it. The person
who is a perpetual faultfinder and chronic critic is usually
anxious to find something wrong because the attitude of his
heart renders him unwilling to give a clear bill of health to
the one criticized. Herein is one of the answers to the
question in the text: the person's attitude and motives are
not right and cause him to do this.
In some cases this thing is done with an objective of salving
one's own conscience. If we have glaring faults in our lives,
somehow it seems to help us feel a little better if we can
make someone else look bad along with us. We somehow get a
false and mistaken idea that we won't look quite so bad if
someone by the side of us can be made to look bad, too. But
let us take no comfort in this. If you were dying with some
malady, what comfort would it be to you for someone to come
visit you and say, "Oh, brother, be of good courage and don't
worry about a thing; hundreds of people out there are dying
with the same thing you have." What comfort could it possibly
be to you just to know that many others were being destroyed
right along with you?
Another answer is that some people seek to build up themselves
by tearing down others. They reason thus: God is blessing and
using this person in an unusual way, and he is having strong
influence among the people. If I can point up enough faults
about him, criticize his methods, point out something that has
not been accomplished, and downgrade him in the eyes of the
people, then I can stand forth as a paragon of perfection in
their eyes by just comparing myself in his trimmed down size.
Another answer is envy. Envy is the most malignant of all
vices; a child of hate with a long, ugly, criminal record
Cain, Saul, the Prodigal's elder brother, the Jews against
Jesus, the 70 princes of Babylon against Daniel, and on and
on. Cain envied Abel because God respected Abel and accepted
his sacrifice and did not respect Cain and accept his
sacrifice. Cain never bothered to check into the cause of
this, but just saw that it was that way and flew into his
brother in a rage of envy and slew him. Saul became envious of
David because the people ascribed to David ten thousands and
to Saul only thousands, and from that time on eyed him and
sought opportunity to destroy him. The Prodigal Son's elder
brother became envious of his younger brother because of the
graciousness of his father to his brother when he returned
from his wanderings. The prodigal's brother found fault with
his father for receiving him back and refused to go in and
share in the bounties of the banquet and the rejoicing of the
occasion. He wound up on the short end and in worse shape than
his prodigal brother, and deprived himself of many bountiful
benefits that he could have had and enjoyed. We always do when
we give place to envy in our hearts toward another person.
Pilate discerned that the Jews delivered Jesus to him to be
crucified because of envy. We sometimes inflict the pangs of
crucifixion upon our fellows with our tongues of envy; and,
oh, the terrible loss we suffer on account of it. The 70
princes of Babylon were moved with envy against Daniel because
they saw him being favored by the king and promoted above them
and concocted a scheme to destroy him. And so He does all
those who humbly submit themselves and trust Him in those
times. He says in Psalm 31:20, "...Thou shalt keep them
secretly in a pavilion from the strife of tongues."
|
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Honesty (Taxes)
Question: Because there are so many dishonest people
all through our government "cheating the people," does this
mean it's all right for us to claim "just a little" of our
income? Many people are being paid in such a way as to avoid
paying taxes. Will God "knit pick" when it comes to Hebrews
13:17?
Answer: The answer is "No." Absolutely not. The
scriptural code that saints live by demands absolute honesty
with God, with ourselves and our own souls, and with our
fellow men. The Scriptures nowhere give us a right to "cheat"
the "cheaters." If we cheat the "cheaters," we are "cheaters,"
too. The amount is not important whether it be large or small.
To be dishonest in small matters or amounts indicates just as
faulty a character as to be dishonest in large matters or
amounts. It can be pretty accurately adjudged that one who is
dishonest in small amounts would also be dishonest in large
amounts if he were just in a position to do so. Let us be
assured that "...God shall bring every work into judgment,
with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be
evil." Eccl. 12:14.
This question reminds me of the story I heard about a preacher
who, in going back and forth from his home to his place of
worship, passed by where a chicken pen was close by the side
of the road. He had noticed a real fine rooster that roosted
on the fence and how easy it would be for someone to just pick
him off and take him away. On one of his trips past this place
when the rooster was perched on the fence as usual, he stopped
and said "Mr. Rooster, some old thief is going to come by here
and get you some of these nights and I think I had better just
take you home with me before some old thief does come by and
get you." So he lifted the rooster and took it home with him
to be cooked in his pot. But in the "rescuing" the rooster
from "some old thief" he became the thief himself. So with
those who "cheat" the "cheaters" on income tax or in any other
way become cheaters themselves.
Also every person who files an income tax return must sign an
oath or affirmation that the statements contained therein are
true and correct to the best of his knowledge. It also says
that the penalty for signing any false statement is a fine
and/or imprisonment or both. How could a Christian sign this
statement knowing he had held back something and had not
properly reported all of his income? My judgment is that he
would suffer a worse penalty for perjuring his conscience
before God than he would from the government for perjuring
himself before them.
God's Word says in I Peter 2:12, "Having your conversation
honest among the Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against
you as evildoers, they may by your good works, which they
shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation." "The
Gentiles" in our case would include all unsaved people, which
would include the "cheaters," too. We are instructed to have
our conversation honest before them also. Let us realize that
two wrongs never make a right.
Again Romans 12:17 says, "Recompense to no man evil for evil.
Provide things honest in the sight of all men." Also II
Corinthians 8:21 says, "Providing for honest things, not only
in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men."
I Corinthians 4:5 says, "Therefore judge nothing before the
time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the
hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels
of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise of God." I
do not hesitate to say, in that day we will all want to
receive praise from God and not condemnation. We can be
assured, in that day, all the hidden things of darkness will
be brought to light and the counsels of all hearts will be
revealed. I Corinthians 3:13 says, "Every man's work shall be
made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall
be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work
of what sort it is." Also II Corinthians 5:10 says, "For we
must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every
one may receive the things done in his body, according to that
he hath done, whether it be good or bad."
Finally, let us conclude that we, as well as the writer of the
Hebrew epistle, are "...In all things willing to live
honestly." Hebrews 13:18. Let us realize that any thing gained
through fraud or dishonesty is not worth it in the end when
every man will be rewarded according to his works. (Revelation
22:12.)
In Regard to God "knit picking" in reference to Hebrews 13:17,
let me say that the answer is again "No." It is not God who
"knit picks," but it is we who do the "knit picking" with
ourselves, with our fellow Christians and fellow men and even
with God Himself, sometimes trying to pick out the fine points
to either justify or condemn as the case may be. God never
"knit picks" but He searches the heart and tries the reins of
every individual (I Chronicles 28:9; I Kings 8:39; Jeremiah
11:20; I Samuel 16:7). Therefore God sees and knows the true
condition of all hearts. We only see the outcroppings of
things but He sees the roots of everything and the true
condition of everyone's heart. Therefore He is in a position
to judge everyone clear, straight, and clean-cut according to
what He sees in the heart.
However, Hebrews 13:17 does not refer to government
authorities but to spiritual authorities in the church. After
instructing us to obey those who have the rule over us and
submit ourselves, it goes on to say, "...For they watch for
your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do
it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for
you." Surely this could not apply to politicians in government
because many times they could not care less about our souls
and the things pertaining unto our spiritual lives. It is the
God-called, God-sent, God-appointed pastors, overseers, and
ministers who care for our souls and watch out for our
spiritual welfare.
However, there are several other Scriptures which teach us to
be subject to the governmental authorities. I Peter 2:13-14
says, "Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the
Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; Or unto
governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the
punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do
well." In Romans 13:1-7 we read, "Let every soul be subject
unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the
powers that be are ordained of God.... Wherefore ye must needs
be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake
(verse 5)...." Let us realize that God has ordained
governments, both political and spiritual, and for us to fail
to be subject to either the governmental powers or the
spiritual authorities in the church indicates a disposition of
rebellion in the heart and God denounces rebellion as being
equal to the sin of witchcraft. (I Samuel 15:23.)
Titus 3:1 says, "Put them in mind to be subject to
principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to
every good work." In the 8th verse of his epistle, Jude speaks
of a degenerate class of people who "despise dominion, and
speak evil of dignities." Then he continues in verse 19 to
say, "These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having
not the Spirit." Let us realize that the Spirit of God in
men's hearts makes them different from that and makes them
humble, submissive, and obedient to authority whether it be in
the government or in the church.
Peter describes the same class of people as Jude and in II
Peter 2:10 he says of them that they despise government, are
presumptuous, self-willed, and are not afraid to speak evil of
dignities. Saints who have the Spirit of God are not like
these people in any respect and are inclined to honor rulers
and those in authority whether they be righteousness or not,
for the sake of their office and position. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Gambling
Question: Where and what Scriptures are there to show
that gambling is wrong? We know that it is wrong, but how can
we pinpoint it out to others who do not see this?
Answer: I do not call to mind at this time any
Scripture that actually spells it out in black and white that
gambling is wrong, but I can give you some solid, scriptural
principles to be guided by. In Romans 12:17 it says,
"...Provide things honest in the sight of all men." II
Corinthians 8:21 says, "Providing for honest things, not only
in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men." I
Peter 2:12 says, "Having your conversation honest among the
Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against you as evildoers,
they may by your good works, which they shall behold, glorify
God in the day of visitation."
Can anyone actually say that gambling in any of its aspects is
an honest, upright business? Until this age of permissiveness,
in which anything goes and there is hardly any such thing as
sin anymore in the eyes of many, it was considered immoral and
those who engaged in it were considered as an undesirable
class by the society in general. Spiritual people still
consider it in the same light. State after state has legalized
it, but in such cases it has been bitterly and strongly
opposed, and one of the major arguments in its favor where it
has been adopted has been the sizable amount of revenue it
would bring into the state's treasury through taxes. The fact
that it has had to be legalized by legislatures and in some
cases by the majority of voters in the state at the polls, and
also that in some states it still is not legal, should
convince any right thinking person that it is not an upright,
honest, moral business.
The writer of the question referred to the professed
Christians doing these things (wagering and betting) and
seeing no harm in it. I would refer these people to the
Christian code of ethics which is to govern Christian living
as set forth in Colossians 3:17 which says, "And whatsoever ye
do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus,..."
and also in I Corinthians 10:31 which says, "Whether therefore
ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of
God." Could anyone actually say, when they place a bet on a
race, ball game, card game, bingo game, or roulette, that "I
am doing this in the name of the Lord Jesus and for the glory
of God"? Certainly not.
Let these people take a second look at I Peter 2:12 and
consider how far they think they would get in witnessing for
Christ and talking to a person about Christ and salvation when
that person knew they had been out there and engaging in such
activities. It certainly is very clearly a thing for professed
Christian people to avoid and not dabble with. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
| Cleanliness
Question: Where does the Bible say, "Cleanliness is
next to godliness," and just how does it apply?
Answer: It doesn't. This is the easiest question I have
had and there is the direct, simple answer. The Bible just
plainly does not say that, as far as I know, but this will
come as a shock to some folks who have heard that quoted for
Scripture all their lives, as I have myself. I do not quote it
as Scripture myself because I could never find it, but I hear
it quoted every now and then.
Since the question is presented and the door is open, I think
I would like to make a few comments on this point. The
question raises an important point whether or not the Bible
spells it out that way.
God was very particular and specific in His instructions
regarding cleanliness throughout the Old Testament. In the
cases of the sin offering for ignorance (Leviticus 4:12), and
the burnt offering (Leviticus 6:11), it is specified that
after all the parts of the bullock were removed which were to
be burned on the altar, all the remains were to be carried
forth without the camp "unto a clean place," and burned there.
God did not allow them to burn even the refuse of His
offerings which were not acceptable on the altar out in a
garbage dump some place, but in a place that was kept clean
and maintained for that purpose. In Leviticus 11:29-47, is an
extensive discussion of unclean beasts, fowls, etc., and in
verse 33, it is said, "And every earthen vessel, whereinto any
of them falleth, whatsoever is in it shall be unclean; and ye
shall break it." That vessel could never be cleansed
sufficiently for use any more. In Isaiah 66:20, it says that
the children of Israel were to bring an offering in a clean
vessel into the house of the Lord. In Numbers 19:1-10, the
water of separation and the sacrifice for providing it is
discussed and in verse 9, we read, "...A man that is clean
shall gather up the ashes of the heifer, and lay them up
without the camp in a clean place,..." Verse 10 says that the
man who gathered the ashes had to wash his clothes and be
considered unclean until the even.
There is much teaching in the Old Testament regarding
cleanliness which is ceremonial, ritualistic, and typical of
spiritual cleanliness and holy living. But all of the above
texts refer clearly to physical and material cleanliness: the
washing of the body, clothes, and a clean place to burn the
refuse parts of the sin and burnt offerings and to store the
ashes, etc. These things were all sacred to God and He
required the proper care of the entire sacrifice, even the
refuse parts of it, in a clean and properly prepared and
maintained place.
Now let us make no mistake about it. Malachi 3:6 tells us that
God changes not. Therefore, we must conclude that God still
appreciates and requires cleanliness. Just as those sacrifices
of old were sacred and holy unto the Lord and He required all
of them to be taken care of in a clean and proper manner, so
are our bodies and all that pertains to them (all the material
appurtenances thereto; the houses we live in and the
surrounding premises, etc.), are sacred and holy unto the Lord
(I Corinthians 6:15, 19-20; I Corinthians 3:16), and He
requires the proper care of them for His glory.
Titus 2:5 teaches us that young married women should be
"...keepers at home,...that the word of God be not
blasphemed." In I Timothy 5:14, they are instructed that they
"...bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the
adversary to speak reproachfully." Both of these texts speak
specifically of the adversary speaking reproachfully and the
Word of God being blasphemed in direct reference to the way
the wife and mother takes care of her home and children. God
requires something of us in this area of our lives.
One man said that he could always tell what kind of people
lived in a house by the appearance of the yard and the
premises on the outside. If the yard was all littered with
papers, debris, and the like, you would not expect to find a
very orderly house and people inside. Disorderly and unkept
houses and children have sometimes brought strong reproach
upon a Christian's profession. Littered houses, unmade beds,
unwashed dishes and unkept children have sometimes nullified
people's testimonies for Christ. The enemy takes great
advantage of these things and cashes in on them to bring
reproach upon the Christian profession and to blaspheme God's
Word and God's people. And God cannot prevent it because it is
contrary to His plan for His people. His approval is not upon
it and there is no way He can justify it and defend the people
involved.
In the over-all picture, the Bible teaches that a husband
should provide and properly maintain a house and all the
necessary things of life for his wife and children. Then it
teaches that the wife and mother should make it "home." This
is the responsibility of the one designated as the "keeper at
home" to make that house a livable, comfortable, and
attractive place to live; something that is inviting for the
children and husband to come home to when the day's activities
are finished. The more attractive she can make it for her
husband and children, the better it will be.
No man, who has been out battling the odds that are against
him on his job or in his business all day long, enjoys coming
home to a cluttered, unkept house with unwashed dishes in the
sink, beds not made, and looking like a disaster. He is
looking for a haven of comfort, love, and understanding at the
end of a difficult day and would like to find it in his home
and with his family.
Evelyn told of going one time some years back with her family
on a camping trip to Big Bear Lake Recreation Area which is
east of Los Angeles. There were several families and couples
camped there and one single man. This lone man spent a lot of
time going among the other campers, talking religion to them
and giving them tracts, etc. The campers said amongst
themselves, "We will just watch and see how he leaves his
campsite when he leaves." Sure enough, when he was ready to
leave, he just loaded up and left, leaving his campsite all
cluttered and littered with papers, scraps of food, etc., for
someone else to clean up. All this man's influence, from all
the commendable work he had done, was nullified because of the
way he left his campsite. This same thing happens over and
over again in camps, in get-togethers, at public or general
dinners, in homes, and premises not properly cared for and in
order.
The same thing applies to personal hygiene also. We all should
be diligent to keep our bodies and the bodies of our children
bathed regularly. We should have our clothes washed and clean
clothes ready for everybody when needed. |
| |
|
(Top of Page) |
|
|
| |
Irregularities in the Church at
Corinth
Question: What is the meaning of I Corinthians 11:1-16?
Answer: I will not here insert the full text of this
passage for the sake of space; but I will suggest that each
reader open your Bible to this place and read the entire
passage for the purpose of obtaining good, clear knowledge of
what it says before reading these comments. However, I will be
inserting key and guiding verses as I proceed to construct my
comments.
First, we must realize and recognize that there were a number
of irregularities both in their collective worship and also in
their personal and private lives in this church at Corinth.
The reason for this was that it was a brand-new church,
freshly converted from heathenism and a number of their
heathen customs and practices were still with them. Much of
this First Corinthian epistle is an endeavor by the apostle
Paul to correct these abuses and clear them up on these
things. This passage is no exception to this and falls in this
category. One will have little difficulty in discerning the
difference in the tenor between the first and second
Corinthian epistles. The first is full of reproofs,
admonitions, etc., while the second has numbers of endearing,
encouraging and commendatory statements because they had given
heed to the admonitions of the first and cleared themselves.
See II Corinthians 7:8-13.
Now to proceed with a discussion of the passage in question. I
Corinthians 11:3 says, "But I would have you know, that the
head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the
man; and the head of Christ is God." This is a basic
foundation verse because it establishes the chain of authority
which is basic throughout this passage. The order is God,
Christ, Man, Woman. But the relationship between the man and
the woman in their order of authority needs to be qualified a
little, I think. And the reason I do think this is found in
verse 10 where it says a woman should have "...power on her
head..." and the margin here says "A covering is sign she is
under the power of her husband." This makes it clear to me
that the overall teaching in the Scriptures is in reference to
the husband and his wife. I do not subscribe to the idea of
the general inferiority of women as such, to men as such. I
see that the only man my wife is to be subject to is myself.
Oh, of course, I concede in this that a woman in a church
congregation is to be subject to her pastor whether that
pastor be a man or a woman; and the same with her boss if she
is a working woman; and the same with magistrates and rulers.
But in all such cases this woman is to be subject to this man,
not as an inferior woman subjecting to a superior man, but for
the position that man holds. And those subjections are limited
and qualified.
Then verse 4 enters into the realm of spiritual worship and
religious service. This verse says if a man prays or
prophesies with his head covered it dishonors his head.
According to verse 3, his head is Christ. There is clearly
something dishonoring to Christ for a man to cover his head.
Verse 7 says he is the image and glory of God. He is to
reflect that glory by having his head uncovered. Then verse 5
says that if a woman prays or prophesies with her head
uncovered it dishonors her head. Her head is the man (her
husband according to verse 10 with marginal reading.) Verses 5
and 6 state that for a woman to have her head uncovered is all
the same as if she were shorn or shaven which would identify
her with the lewd, immoral women which would dishonor her
husband.
It was customary practice among these Gentile people from time
immemorial for their women to wear veils for head covering
when in public. Paul seems to be finding it necessary here to
be doing some adjusting to their custom (to them who were
without the law, he became without law; and he became all
things to all men that he might by all means save some I
Corinthians 9:21-22) as he did on different occasions in order
to gain them. And verses 4 and 7 perhaps refer to the covering
of the head with veils. This was necessary, under the
circumstances, because of the deep-rooted traditional practice
of this among these people, for they would be very reluctant
to accept the gospel without this. However, Paul goes right
ahead to set forth the gospel standard on this point. He says
in verse 15, "But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to
her: for her hair is given her for a covering (Margin:
"veil"). Then it is evident here that the New Testament
standard for New Testament saints is long hair which God has
given her for her head covering (veil).
Verses 8 and 9 and 11 and 12 simply refer to the creation of
the male and female and how the chain of authority was
established. The man was created first; then the woman was
taken from the man and brought to him for his wife. But ever
since that first pair, every man of the race has been
conceived in the womb of a woman and has come forth from her
and the same is true of every woman. Neither men nor women
could ever have been here except by the union of a man and a
woman who were here before them, so there is absolutely no
room for boasting of either of them over the other.
Now returning to verse 10 a little. Verse 9 says the woman was
created for the man and verse 10 says that because of this she
should have power on her head (Margin: A covering is sign that
she is under the power of her husband). Verse 15 declares this
God-given covering to be the woman's long hair. And the
standard for godly women in the Church of God in this New
Testament age is declared to be long hair which they wear as a
sign of subjection to their husbands, which is another
God-given requirement for godly women in this New Testament
age.
The phrase "Because of the angels" in verse 10; I don't know
if I can make any good commentary on that. I will give the
best that occurs to me at this time. Hebrews 12:22 says that
when we come to Mount Sion (the New Testament Church of God)
we come "...to an innumerable company of angels." Hebrews 1:14
says concerning the angels that they are all ...ministering
spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of
salvation. The thought that is a thriller to me is that every
time the saints meet together (whether many or few) there is
always a generous number of angels present to minister to the
needs of the saints who are there and they fly hither and yon
distributing to the needs of everyone there, meeting their
individual needs even though the message did not deal directly
with that point. But this is not the only function of these
ministering angels. They also accompany us about wherever we
go observing the needs of our individual lives in the home and
elsewhere, observing that wife and mother and how she conducts
herself, how she offers her life, how well she is measuring up
to the truth and submitting to her husband, etc. Because of
this the text says she needs the sign showing her submission
to her husband. The angels are looking on everything and are
able, ready and willing to help you and administer to any lack
or need you have. It is the same with the husband, too, but
this particular verse was referring to the wife so I trailed
off on it that way.
One more point now verse 16, "...If any man seem to be
contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of
God." There is a broad area of contention on this text which I
consider to be so unnecessary. Moffit's translation says on
the last part of this verse, "Well, I acknowledge no other
mode of worship." And Good-speed's translation says at this
place, "I for my part recognize no other practice in worship
than this." These two translations correspond well with the
way I interpret verse 16 in my King James Bible. It is spelled
out in black and white in the 15th verse that long hair is the
covering for her head and according to verse 10 (margin) it is
a sign that she is under the power of her husband. This is all
plainly taught. Therefore, if a man is contentious against
this he would be contending for short hair and the taking away
of the God-given sign of her subjection to her husband and we
recognize no such custom in the Church of God. The standard
held in the New Testament Church of God for all time, then and
now, is long hair and submission to their husbands for all
godly women. |
|